Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-18-2005, 12:06 PM
pearljam pearljam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 130
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

how much should he have bet pre-flop?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-18-2005, 12:06 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

Yeah, I think it's best. I just have an ingrained dislike of lines that involve check-calling for potentially my entire stack, even though it probably is the right move here.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-18-2005, 12:09 PM
Offsprung Offsprung is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 60
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

Bet the flop. Check/fold.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-18-2005, 12:10 PM
Unarmed Unarmed is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

[ QUOTE ]
Bet the flop. Check/fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-18-2005, 01:47 PM
suited_ace suited_ace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 442
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

Unarmed, I really like your line. Just to make things clear, here's how the hand was played for me...

I raise PF (and yeah, I think I was a little bit too trigger-happy, but at the same time I'm trying to compensate for all those limpers) and get one caller. This built a large pot, and when the flop came I was torn between checking or throwing a continuation bet that would totally pot-commit me.

I chose checking and when he checked behind I was pretty sure that my hand was good. That's why I bet the turn, and I would've called a possible push from Villain, btw. The river check was a shot at CR him all-in.

How much would you have raised PF?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-18-2005, 01:49 PM
suited_ace suited_ace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 442
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

[ QUOTE ]
Aces are pretty much death to kings at low-level buy-ins (people looove their aces) so I would probably check it down.

[/ QUOTE ]

This was a $55. It's not a $215, but it's not a $11 either...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:16 PM
Unarmed Unarmed is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?

[ QUOTE ]
How much would you have raised PF?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oops. I didn't see the other limper.
Still I probably make it 175.
I want action with KK.
Plus I don't vary my PF raises by hand and if I have AK I don't want to pot stick myself.

I'm different though...
In lev 3+ when not pushing PF I generally make it 2.5BB +1/2BB for each limper. It fits my playing style better. If you're c-betting a good chunk of your whiffed AKs then the old 3BB+1 for each limper is fine.

That's pretty general advice though, every situation is different and you always want to consider what sort of pot size and remaining stack you'll have if called in one or two places.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-18-2005, 04:28 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: How\'s this for post-flop play?


When your stack equals the amount of money in the pot you should generally play it extremely strongly. You have some kind of hand and free cards could be dangerous, Id simply move allin on the flop.

Yes you probably won't get called by worse hands of course but this is irrelevant when the pot is large, what's really important to you is winning the 600 in the pot with as little problem as possible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.