Do Available Hand Histories Make You More Likely to Play Full Tilt?

[PokrLikeItsProse]

[ QUOTE ]
Where did you see that pokertracker is adding support?

[/ QUOTE ]

In the PokerTracker forum, the person behind it said that FTP had consulted with in an effort to make sure the hand histories would be compatible with the software.

Plus, if you've looked at the hand histories, it seems like it should be relatively easy to support.

As for the SNGs, in my experience, although I don't play them often, you are much less likely to ever see things like three people gone before the first orbit is over. Some people who complain about all-in fests may think that is a good thing.

Tight is relative. Most full ring games seem to be in the 25-35% range for flops seen. For 6-max games, you have some in a similar range and some that are over 50%. If you always wanted to play low-limit hold em that wasn't no fold em hold em, this is your site. The pros on the site are fish magnets, especially when they play non hold em games and attract players who normally only play hold em.

[obsidian]

I most certainly would.

[CJHunt]

Sholdn't the fish be flocking to full tilt anyway in a couple months when all the WSOP broadacasts start? Matusow or Ivey was almost always at the TV table late. Between them they should get enough screen time to push full tilts numbers up.

[SoCalRugger]

That's what I was thinking. Between all the commercials they've been running, the live tournament, and Ivey/Juanda/Matusow's results at the main event, there has to be a rush of new players to Full Tilt around the time the main event airs. Does anybody disagree with this?