|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Trips no kicker hand.
[ QUOTE ]
Why would you just call? He only has $3 left, wouldn't it be alright to just put him all-in then? He's obviously not folding. [/ QUOTE ] Obviously if I call, I'm calling the final $3 on the river. I think there's little to no chance he folds for the final $3 any way you play it but I think there's a fraction of a tiny bit of a percentage chance (i.e. very small) that he might fold if I raise so I'll wait and let him put it in himself. Its really splitting hairs, though. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Trips no kicker hand.
just call and don't be results oriented here, for better or worse. He's OOP as ghaz mentioned, he may have a pair of 3s or 7s for all you know and I'd love to see that.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Trips no kicker hand.
Yeah, but he might also accidentally fold or something [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I know I've misclicked at least once in my life.
But yeah, I was basically just asking if there was a difference. Clearly all the money's going in the middle, so I guess there really isn't any difference whatsoever (the only thing is that I noticed people tend to regard all-in as looking more powerful, so I'm not sure if the almost all-in is a ploy to appear weaker when holding the nuts, I know if I were in his shoes, I'd just go all-in). I've also heard a guy who'll leave a dollar behind, so that he gets to see his opponent's hand first when they go all-in. EDIT: You're right, this is splitting hairs. |
|
|