Does SSHE apply to nano-limits? - Page 2

Greg J · #11 07-09-2005, 08:32 PM

b/c = because, as in "I use it b/c I'm lazy."

Watain · #12 07-09-2005, 08:34 PM

[ QUOTE ]
b/c = because, as in "I use it b/c I'm lazy."

[/ QUOTE ]

Ahhh thx, i see. Thought it was some hip poker slang.

/Torben

afk · #13 07-09-2005, 09:08 PM

Nano-limit games (online) are pretty much the very type of games SSH was written for, they don't get much better than that. You'll find the same type of games in a lot of casinos at 2/4 and 3/6 (and higher).

UATrewqaz · #14 07-09-2005, 09:24 PM

Nanolimit play is very profitable but you rarely win many pots! Mull that over

Nanolimit play you rarely win with TPTK or something like that, considering how many hands go to showdown.

Basically play premium cards (raising them for value earlier). And those occassions you flop a monster or a set or top two pair, etc. are going to pay off huge in terms of BB.

Oh after reading SSHE I went on a a pretty big upswing, followed by an even larger downswing.

I then figured out what I was misapplying and corrected and have been riding the curve way way up since.

BatsShadow · #15 07-09-2005, 09:28 PM

SSHE applies more to .1/.2 than party .5/1, but it seems you can also apply to almost any game at Pacific Poker. .25/.5, .5/1, they are like 70% to the flop. I haven't played 1/2 there yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's the same.

It also applies very much to low limit casino play. at the 3/6 in detroit it wasn't uncommon to see 6 players to the flop for a raise.