where are more fish LA or LV?

[PokerPaul]

would assume LV since there are way more tourists, who only know BJ and roulette and decide to sit down and give poker a try, which is not so easy in LA.

In LA the casinos are more geared to strictly pokerplayers so less impulse poker wannabes.

Anyways thats just my assumptions.

Am just trying to decide whether to play my next roadtrip in LA or LV

[highlife]

you are gonna drive to LV or LA from Toronto? good luck with that.

[PokerPaul]

uhhhh ...no.

they have a thing called airplanes that get there much faster.

[Maulik]

perhaps the hero wants a road trip across America with his friends...?

[J.A.Sucker]

Randy Newman had and has the right answer, as always.

[Rick Nebiolo]

You might enjoy this classic snakehead post regarding the difference between Las Vegas and LA fish. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

~ Rick

[highlife]

[ QUOTE ]
uhhhh ...no.

they have a thing called airplanes that get there much faster.

[/ QUOTE ]

OP:
[ QUOTE ]

Am just trying to decide whether to play my next roadtrip in LA or LV

[/ QUOTE ]

"road" implies bus/car/truck. i wasn't trying to be a nit i was seriously asking why you would drive there.

[Prelude008]

I think the best poker, by far, in in LA. Lots of games/action 24/7, especially at big places like the Commerce. If you are looking for total casino experience (i.e. slots, bj, etc) then go to vegas. If it's just poker, LA's the place.

[PokerPaul]

lol..no problem...just caught that...sould have just said trip then, not roadtrip.

Although, sometime maybe that would be fun. Kind of like puggy pearson in his roving gamble van.

[westmt01]

By "best poker" do you mean easiest games to beat, or just more action in general? I just got back from Vegas yesterday (Monday), and it's hard to imagine worse players at the low limits than places like Imperial Palace and Excalibur.

If LA players in general are worse than Vegas players (esp. at low limits), I'd like to know so that I can start booking a plane trip now.