Liberals

Felix won't have time to respond. He's too busy "pawning" the liberals.

[MMMMMM]

[ QUOTE ]
Felix won't have time to respond. He's too busy "pawning" the liberals.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can actually make some good money with this if you find the right pawnshop.

[Felix_Nietsche]

"can you show me where in my post you can find the part where i say what you claim i said?"
**************************************************
"the short answer? overly conservative judges retard the natural progression of society. without liberal judges we wouldn't have a lot of the social justice laws we have now (women/blacks being able to vote, gay rights, discrimination laws, etc) that are pretty much essential."

You still have been not supported this ridiculous statement. If your going to make silly claims, then be prepare to support them.

[Analyst]

[ QUOTE ]
I heard one conservative talk show host (Michael Savage) refer to these renegade judges as "the stench from the bench is making me rench".

[/ QUOTE ]

Not much point in arguing with anyone who uses Savage as a benchmark. He foams at the mouth, "They're stealing our vote!" when judges overturn something in which he believes, as in the case of several California ballot propositions but applauds the same "vote stealing" if the decision goes the other way (ex: medical marijuana).

[pryor15]

it's like being in a beckett play. this is absurd.

[goofball]

[ QUOTE ]
OK so are you saying that because people will break a law, there should be serious thought as to whether or not the law should exist? If so I agree with that.

I go back and forth on abortion and have for the last 3-4 years. I should say I do polictically, my own beliefs are stead fast. At the same time it is one of my least important issues when backing a candidate.

Currently I am of the belief that it is best left up to the states so that each populace can decide for themselves what is best.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, stance on abortion is one of the most asinine reasons to select a candidate. Right up there with how handsome he is.

If abortion were illegal in state x of course the number would decrease. They would just increase in all the bordering states.

[nothumb]

First, you're an idiot, and second, why can't you use the quote function properly? It would make reading your mindless drivel slightly less painful.

NT