Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2005, 09:52 AM
miami32 miami32 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Borgata or the Taj
Posts: 142
Default Short handed omaha8

Does anyone have suggestions on shorthanded omaha8. I do very well playing ring games but sooner or later I should expand into shorthanded play. There is basicly nothing to help show me how to play though. Basic thought process tells me hands that play for scooping that have versitality would work best and not just straight low hands. Should I be playing that much more aggressive? What is the best strategy for 1/2 and 5/10 party poker 6 max games?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-04-2005, 03:30 PM
Buzz Buzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 598
Default Re: Short handed omaha8

[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone have suggestions on shorthanded omaha8.

[/ QUOTE ]

Miami - I try to avoid them.

[ QUOTE ]
Basic thought process tells me hands that play for scooping that have versitality would work best and not just straight low hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seems that way. Kind of depends on what is working. Sometimes the game is either smash the serve and rush the net or defend against such tactics. In these games it seems like you should look for good one-on-one hands. Otherwise, I think you try to adapt to how your opponents are playing. There are lots of possibilities.

[ QUOTE ]
Should I be playing that much more aggressive?

[/ QUOTE ]

In general, you should be more aggressive - but you may not get many opponents who want to play with you if you play too aggressively. That is, in a casino, the game will tend to break up if it becomes too aggressive.

The same is true in private games. Losers who have been pounded on all evening (and who consequently didn't have much fun) may not want to play with you again.

[ QUOTE ]
What is the best strategy for 1/2 and 5/10 party poker 6 max games?

[/ QUOTE ]

Someone else could better advise you on this topic.

Buzz
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2005, 05:35 PM
templar999 templar999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 129
Default Re: Short handed omaha8

miami,

shorthanded omaha8 can get to be a pretty nutty game. hand values change a lot. for a 6 handed game, i think your basic starting strategy stays the same, but you obviously loosen up your starting hand requirements. A3xx plays much closer to A2xx, A4xx to A3xx, and so forth. hands like A57K double suited become decent hands that you might even want to raise with. 23's with a couple of high cards are playable as well.

in the real shorthanded games with 4 players (anything less than that, it becomes really boring as players are splitting every pot and the rakes and tips are too big unless you're at 20-40 or above), the game really changes entirely. in fact, it's a little counterintuitve. high hands gain a lot of value while low hands are usually drawing. when 4 players see a flop and a low is out there, it is almost certain someone will have it, and the nuts at that. when 2 players see a flop and a low is out there, there's a slightly moderate chance that low is either counterfeited or a really crappy low draw that may not make it to the river. A2xx, while definitely still playable, will not get paid off by two or three other players drawing to non nut lows. you'd really want some high pairs or connectors to go along with it, or at least one more card below an 8. a hand like QQT8 can often win the high side unimproved, and even hands like KQJ9 and have good prospects. being suited is still a bonus, but you usually wont have any odds to draw to them. even hands like KK45 are usually playable for a raise. these hands are strong for the high part and can often sneak into a low by accident. even a backup 27 for low is worth something. the best hand in my opinion is a suited or double suited 4 straight all under an 8. 2345, 3456, 4567, 5678, though the latter two are a bit more marginal and you have to be able to get away from it and realize when you're second best both ways. you have a lot of scooping potential with hands like this. one gappers are okay as well.

as always, stay away from the small and medium pairs. headsup or three way, they often wind up getting crushed, as you'll usually need to hit a set to win. dont play them unless there's a LOT else going for it. even beware of hands like A22x or A33x. in a pot with three or more players, getting half the pot is a profit. in a pot with two players, you have no prospects for high. if you hit your ace, your low is gone. i'd much rather have a hand like A3Q9 then a hand like A229 shorthanded, whereas in a full game, the latter is a bit more playable.

i think if you just keep in mind that the object of the game to scoop is even more important in a shorthanded game as there's no dead money to make getting half the pot profitable, it'll be easier to figure out which hands do better than others.

hope this helps.

respectfully,
temp
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2005, 01:35 AM
stud7champ stud7champ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 85
Default Re: Short handed omaha8

My advice dont play short handed there is too much variation. One night in 5/10 you could be up 400 and the next down 400. Apart from skill there is a lot of psycology which cannot be taught. its like options v stock you can make a killing or lose a lot.
No book adequately describes short handed play even Stewert rueben and Zee were killed by a short handed specialist and the they are in the top 15 of all o8 players.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2005, 10:21 AM
Wintermute Wintermute is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 612
Default Re: Short handed omaha8

I play almost exclusively short handed (PLO8 now, but used to play 5/10 & 10/20 limit short-handed). These three are in my mind the most important factors to consider:

1) Game selection becomes critical. You're pushing non-nut hands in SH play, so skill (or at least experience in marginal situations) is more necessary than restraint which might be the most important aspect of full-ring play. Make sure you're playing against people who have poorer judgment or less experience in guaging the strength of mediocre hands.

2) Bankroll requirements are higher. Someone already said it, variance will be higher in short-handed play.

3) Does the nature of the game mesh well with your natural tendencies. For me, SH is perfect because I am somewhat of a LAG. Full-ring makes me impatient, I play marginal hands and get burned on occasion. SH not only allows you to play marginal hands but requires you to be aggressive with them when appropriate. For example, there will be a lot of steal attempts going on from continuation bets from PF raisers, so sometimes you have to put in a raise on the turn with nothing to set up a river bluff that will pay off. If that sort of gambling is uncomfortable for you, it's not going to work.

good luck, hope this helps
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2005, 11:15 AM
HajiShirazu HajiShirazu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 414
Default Re: Short handed omaha8

I don't have good strategy advice to give, at least better than what has already been given here, but I will say that the rake is really, really crushing in these games, so make sure that you're either playing total retards which do tend to populate such games or are in a fairly high limit game where it isn't as bad, and also try to be getting bonuses or rakeback.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.