Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:09 PM
Needle77 Needle77 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jeresy
Posts: 72
Default Odds on WSOP ME

I was checking out Bodog and they have odds on who will win the ME this year. Ivey and Negreanu are the two top with 200-1 odds with many 225-1 to follows(fan favorite Hellmuth being one, heh) If you've seen these or other, how accurate would you say they made these? I mean...they put Esfandieri(350-1) behind Raymer(325-1), nothing against last years winner. I just don't know how to take these numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:30 PM
TimTimSalabim TimTimSalabim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 660
Default Re: Odds on WSOP ME

Those odds are nuts, nobody should be better than 500-1, probably not even 1000-1. But that's how those places stay in business.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:32 PM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: Odds on WSOP ME

[ QUOTE ]
I was checking out Bodog and they have odds on who will win the ME this year. ... Raymer(325-1), nothing against last years winner. I just don't know how to take these numbers.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm a terrible bet at 325-1.

Of course, at 325-1, any TWO players you care to pick are a pretty bad bet, let alone any one. The best in the field is at least 1000-1 against in reality.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2005, 06:38 PM
Ed Miller Ed Miller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Writing \"Small Stakes Hold \'Em\"
Posts: 4,548
Default Re: Odds on WSOP ME

[ QUOTE ]
I just don't know how to take these numbers.

[/ QUOTE ]

They are all terrible bets. Now you know.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2005, 07:01 PM
Dan Rutter Dan Rutter is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 23
Default Re: Odds on WSOP ME

Mike Caro has a small article on his website stating that he believes the odds against the best player winning the ME are 1,639 to 1.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-04-2005, 02:16 AM
Photoc Photoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sin City
Posts: 283
Default Re: Odds on WSOP ME

How do you guys feel on the heads up matches? Whomever finishes higher. I saw some pretty good bets in there like Raymer vs Moneymaker both at -120. Pretty much every televised "rivalry" from the past decade is in there such as Sidel vs Chan, Damon vs Chan, Duke vs Afleck, and so on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-04-2005, 02:50 AM
HighStakesPro HighStakesPro is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Odds on WSOP ME

I also have checked out Bodog's odds, and I agree the odds for big names are absolutely terrible. However, if there was one bet I'd make, it would be $5 (the absolute minimum you're allowed to bet on a player) on Erik Sagstrom at 1250 to 1. The guy has major internet experience and success, made a final table at the Five Star Classic this year, and from what I know he's very aggressive and probably willing to gamble enough to give him a decent chance to build a big stack, in which case he'd be a real threat. Besides that, Mark Gregorich wrote an article for card player in which he quoted one pro who said that if he was setting odds he would make Sagstrom the (relative) FAVORITE to win the main event. If you want to make a bet just for fun and have an outside chance of winning 1250x your bet, this is as good a chance as any.

As far as the last-longer bets, I have taken a very close look at them and believe that some of the bets may be pretty good. The main thing to consider is that in almost every case it's a virtual coinflip a to who lasts longer, because so much of it depends on table draw, which first day they draw, and so many other factors, and most of the pros are close enough in skill level that my guess is nobody has a really significant chance of outlasting someone else, unless its an extreme case of a rock against a maniac, where you might take the rock. But because most of these matchups are probably about 50/50, I went down the list and chose the ones that pay out better than even money for a win, except for Moneymaker vs Raymer (+120) cause we all know Moneymaker sucks, and Raymer has made the final table in a 2300+ field TWICE now, proving he's a real threat to go deep again. The other one I didn't take is Paul Phillips vs Phil Hellmuth (+110) both because Hellmuth always gets there late and generally is willing to sit on a shortstack for awhile, whereas Phillips is more likely to gamble. Here are the matchups I did take:

Evelyn Ng over David Williams (+120)
Joe Cassidy over Daniel Negreanu (+120)
Paul Darden over Phil Ivey (+120)
Brett Jungblut over Scott Fischman (+120)
Matt Damon over Johnny Chan (+160)

I was planning on putting $10 on each of these and $2 on Sagstrom, and deposited $62, but I forgot about the 20% deposit bonus and ended up with $74.40, then realized Sagstrom would cost at least $5 so I decided against it, and ended up putting $12.50 on the first five (to win $15) and $11.90 on Damon (to win $19.04)

I have never bet on sports or poker or anything like this before, but if anyone else is placing any bets or has na opinion on my bets then I'd be happy to hear it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.