Top 10 10/20 6maxers (LC)

[ISF]

huh browneyes is one of my buddies. If he has position on you I guess he can be annoying if your not hitting, but he is one of the more predictable lags and when you are hitting or have position on him is very exploitable.

[sthief09]

[ QUOTE ]
huh browneyes is one of my buddies. If he has position on you I guess he can be annoying if your not hitting, but he is one of the more predictable lags and when you are hitting or have position on him is very exploitable.

[/ QUOTE ]


he's not a LAG at all. he's actually pretty much average in every way

[Grisgra]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd put DriedSeaweed up there too, but maybe he's a 2p2er whose name you know, so you didn't include him. too bad he bitches so much, and I've noticed him tilting twice

[/ QUOTE ]

I've noticed him a ton recently, must be a 2+2'er that either just moved up from 5/10, or (more likely) switched names. I don't know who he is, but I vaguely recall him being a 30/20 player, and I avoid that particular breed of nutcase when I can. I prefer to be the only 30/20 nutcase at the table, thank you very much.

[sthief09]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'd put DriedSeaweed up there too, but maybe he's a 2p2er whose name you know, so you didn't include him. too bad he bitches so much, and I've noticed him tilting twice

[/ QUOTE ]

I've noticed him a ton recently, must be a 2+2'er that either just moved up from 5/10, or (more likely) switched names. I don't know who he is, but I vaguely recall him being a 30/20 player, and I avoid that particular breed of nutcase when I can. I prefer to be the only 30/20 nutcase at the table, thank you very much.

[/ QUOTE ]


he's actually tighter. 24/17ish

[baronzeus]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd put DriedSeaweed up there too, but maybe he's a 2p2er whose name you know, so you didn't include him. too bad he bitches so much, and I've noticed him tilting twice

[/ QUOTE ]

He's a 2+2er.



I also have 4K hands on lolomgbbq and he's -4BB/100 over thoes hands.

[BottlesOf]

I'm not on there [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]


[img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[paven]

I would add Kalastaja8 to that list. He is the only player I try to avoid in the 1020 games simply because he is good at getting tricky at the right spots. His pre- and post- game is also good imo.

Browneyes is possibly the player I have played the most against, and he is absolutely horrible imo. The reads posted above here seem dead on.

Other good players I agree with mentioned here are luckyAi, Molecul0 and bongineer, who I all have noted.

Two interesting players imo are incog66 and LuckyMfcker. They both play similarily maniacish with loads of misplaced aggression, and i have both of the down as losers after 1k+ hands vs them, but they still hang around both the 15\30 and 10\20 6-m tables. Anyone have any comments on these two?

[Trix]

You really think it matters much whether you have 5K or 30K hands on someone ? or do you mine that much to get the people who only play once in a while ?

[jwg152]

Kalastaja8 is fairly mediocre IMO. I always welcome his presence at my table

Bongineer is ok. He used to always be at my table. Now, I never see him. Maybe it's the fact that I've laid the wood to his arse

LuckyAi had my number when we played - which wasn't too often

Dried Seaweed - somewhat solid, punky, tilts often, exploitable

Molecul0- played with him some, seems like a solid TAG - he didn't really make any plays that I thought warrant the priase he receives here- but I've haven't played too much with him.

Brown Eyes - fish eyes

[sthief09]

[ QUOTE ]
You really think it matters much whether you have 5K or 30K hands on someone ? or do you mine that much to get the people who only play once in a while ?

[/ QUOTE ]


the point is there are a lot of guys that don't play that much who are good, and it's likely he hasn't played with them. he's played 120k hands, which is a lot for most things, but he's only seen a very small piece of the overall player pool.