#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An interesting hand
[ QUOTE ]
Here is how I play it, which is not necessarily the best or even a correct way to play it at the 22's: Limp preflop. Bet ~200 on the flop. Check the turn. Call that river. [/ QUOTE ] What makes you and lastchance think that this was a 22? It was a 33. Not that there is all that much difference. Suerte, Jonathan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An interesting hand
Just a guess. Meh, t800 chips. Player posting... Meh, $22's seemed like a good guess, and adanthar just copied what I said I suppose.
I like adanthar's line a bit. Given your read, I call the river too. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An interesting hand
[ QUOTE ]
Here is how I play it, which is not necessarily the best or even a correct way to play it at the 22's: Limp preflop. Bet ~200 on the flop. Check the turn. Call that river. [/ QUOTE ] So the way you would play it, by limping, I would end up having to make the same decision for all my chips on the river, but with one crucial difference- I let the small blind and big blind in the hand to possibly out flop me. Wouldn't it be better to play AJo against one opponent rather than 3? Perhaps I should have called the river bet. Knowing this players tendencies, I later regretted my fold. But if I am planning on calling the river for all my chips, then wouldn't it be better to go all-in myslef on the turn? Suerte, Jonathan |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An interesting hand
Because getting called and missing sucks. Because SB and BB are paying you off if you flop 2 pair or better. Because you've only got t800 behind, and raising to t120 is 1/8th of your stack.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: An interesting hand
I can see an argument for not raising but I can't see one for not playing at all.
|
|
|