Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-28-2005, 09:50 AM
Nick C Nick C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,582
Default Re: \"Rocks\" unprofitable at 3/6

[ QUOTE ]
Nick, this is consistent with what I would expect to find with small sample sizes ("several thousand hands"). Dice players will tend to be both the biggest winners and the biggest losers in a small sample size. And since 2/3 of all players lose money, "most of the rocks and eagles" will lose money as well as most of everyone else. You would need an enormous database before the people at the top of your database actually represented the best players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, this does make sense.

To be honest, I didn't notice that the phrasing in the post I was responding to left the possibility open that some dice players were among the biggest losers.

But if that's the explanation, the post was deceptive, whether intentionally or not.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.