A possible tell..(anyone consider this)

[jstewsmole]

Im probably using the term "ABC" incorrectly. I thought it meant more predictable, not-so-tricky type of poker.
Sorry if that confused anyone.

[bernie]

[ QUOTE ]
Not only are they not true, they are in fact the opposite of how a multi-tabling TAG plays.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only TAGs multitable? He didn't mention that at all in his post that I saw. Many dopes multitable also. ABC players are very predictable, especially when they're multi-tabling. ABC doesn't always equate to TAG. It more equates with predictability.

He does have a point in his post. Many who multi table do not follow each table that well and you 'can' put a move on them easier, in general. 1 form of proof on this forum, look at many hand posts on this forum where they can't even put a read on even the table. "I'm on my 40th hand, no reads..."

Even if someone is a TAG, they usually aren't playing 4-8 tables the same way, with the same attention to detail as they will 1-2 tables.

b

[bernie]

[ QUOTE ]
Im probably using the term "ABC" incorrectly. I thought it meant more predictable, not-so-tricky type of poker.
Sorry if that confused anyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is what it means.

b

[jstewsmole]

I was refering to crunchys reply. If that is what it means then bluf raising the river IMO is not ABC.

Iguess thats neither here nor there though.
Thnks for the reply

[trainslayer]

Just how many tables doesn't answer the question. How at how many tables might. A rock the only plays 5-10% vpip and pfr less than ~5% can usually be pushed around some. But a smart, agressive player can't be read that easily IMO. There are more than one type of TAG.

[ QUOTE ]
If you know they are multi tabling it gives you a very strong advantage IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your opinion is off IMO.