#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
[ QUOTE ]
do I under estimate the value of KTs? [/ QUOTE ] yep versus 4 limpers, you have a nice equity edge, plus you're position rocks |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] do I under estimate the value of KTs? [/ QUOTE ] yep versus 4 limpers, you have a nice equity edge, plus you're position rocks [/ QUOTE ] Hero is not the position. He is in good position though. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
nit [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] do I under estimate the value of KTs? [/ QUOTE ] yep versus 4 limpers, you have a nice equity edge, plus you're position rocks [/ QUOTE ] Hero is not the position. He is in good position though. [/ QUOTE ] Hero is not the position? damn I've been reading these wrong the whole time. I always wondered how many hands I'd have to play to gain hero position. To answer the question yes you underestimate the value of KTs when you have position on all these guys. It also helps you take control of the hand. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
That flop call/3-bet could be trips or a flush. I'm having trouble thinking of any other hands he could do it with. I'm not confident enough in my trips to raise here, even though I'd like BB to fold. I'd call the turn because of my redraw and call the river b/c of the size of the pot.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
[img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: First hand post
Nevermind--didn't see pages 2 and 3 and repeated what someone else already said. I'm new here.
|
|
|