|
|
|
|
#1
06-21-2005, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pocket 8s on the button, standard?
[ QUOTE ]
Again - this is really just semantics. [/ QUOTE ] I totally agree; it is just semantics, and I know you're advocating a raise for the right reasons. But this term gets misused constantly, and new posters like myself can fall into traps if they don't understand that the value of raising for a free card (as defined in TOP) is predicated on the bet size increasing on the next street. As always, thanks for taking the time to respond. 
|
|
#2
06-21-2005, 07:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pocket 8s on the button, standard?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Again - this is really just semantics. [/ QUOTE ] I totally agree; it is just semantics, and I know you're advocating a raise for the right reasons. But this term gets misused constantly, and new posters like myself can fall into traps if they don't understand that the value of raising for a free card (as defined in TOP) is predicated on the bet size increasing on the next street. As always, thanks for taking the time to respond. [/ QUOTE ] I was just reading in Middle Limit Holdem Poker, and on page 26, Ciaffone and Brier deal with this very topic. I thought I'd throw that out here.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
