#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ugly top set hand
What do you think?
Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, SB completes, Hero checks. Flop: (5 SB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, UTG+1 calls, MP2 folds, SB folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls. Turn: (7 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 caps</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls. River: (19 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, Hero folds, <font color="#CC3333">UTG 3-bets</font>, UTG+1 calls. Final Pot: 25 BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
PF and flop are fairly standard I think.
Turn sucks. But you still have 10 outs to the boat or better (which will be a big winner, especially if someone has a flush). You need 3.5:1 to call for 10 outs, and you're definetly getting it here on the turn. Have to fold the river UI though, as you're definetly drawing on the turn. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
I'd like to have some reads on UTG & UTG+1 here, because based on the way this hand played out I'm not so sure you were even drawing live on the turn. With a 4-flush showing & the two of them trying to outraise each other, the possibility of a straight flush has to be considered.
That said, against two unknowns I'm not folding the turn, either. I probably would've led it, though. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
[ QUOTE ]
I'd like to have some reads on UTG & UTG+1 here, because based on the way this hand played out I'm not so sure you were even drawing live on the turn. With a 4-flush showing & the two of them trying to outraise each other, the possibility of a straight flush has to be considered. That said, against two unknowns I'm not folding the turn, either. I probably would've led it, though. [/ QUOTE ] Are you arguing for a possible fold on the turn cap, but not on the turn 2-bet? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
Nah no way. I don't any of us will ever fold that turn.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
[ QUOTE ]
Nah no way. I don't any of us will ever fold that turn. [/ QUOTE ] that why Harv said that we need a good read here to determine what the play is. I'm calling both raises myself against unkowns. Everything here is pretty standard. nh |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
[ QUOTE ]
that why Harv said that we need a good read here to determine what the play is. I'm calling both raises myself against unkowns. Everything here is pretty standard. nh [/ QUOTE ] Ok good. Villains had A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ugly top set hand
Bang!
|
|
|