|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If yes, for what reason? | |||
| Look good => Feel good => Play good |
   
|
28 | 28.87% |
| Make yourself as comfotable as possible |
  
|
55 | 56.70% |
| If I wear the same clothes as the pros I will do as well as them |
  
|
8 | 8.25% |
| Other |
  
|
6 | 6.19% |
| Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
06-15-2005, 03:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To Peel or not to Peel
Fold. We have 5 outs to two-pair/trips and let's say 1 out for the back-door flush. We need 6.8-1 to call and we're not getting it. This is almost the best case scenario. The chance of us having the best hand now is pretty slim with a mid-position bet and a call and I'm assuming our hand is good if we hit the Q or 3. If it's not, we have big reverse-implied odds. If it is, we only have good implied odds against 78.
|
|
#12
06-15-2005, 03:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To Peel or not to Peel
[ QUOTE ]
I'd give myself 5 solid outs, plus with this board you may currently have the best hand. You have odds to peel. Incidentally, I would have bet out on this flop. [/ QUOTE ] I would have with one less limper. This pot size showed up because of three limpers.
|
|
#13
06-15-2005, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I voted no.....
with my money at the table and here in the pole. I knew it was close so I decided to post it.
1. There is a slim chance my Q and 3 outs are tainted(i.e. one of my opponents limped with A3 or Q8). 2. I can make my hand and still be outdrawn. 3. My backdoor flush draw is not to the nuts. At best I got 5.5 outs and without reads(it was my first hand at the table) I have no gaurantee implied odds will carry me to profitability. PinLifter
|
|
#14
06-15-2005, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I voted no.....
[ QUOTE ]
1. There is a slim chance my Q and 3 outs are tainted(i.e. one of my opponents limped with A3 or Q8). [/ QUOTE ] I mentioned this before, but isn't at least one of your opponent's betting pattern consistent with 77 or 88? To which your 3 Qs and 2 3s are drawing dead. You should discount for this, too. Am I missing something? -k
|
|
#15
06-15-2005, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To Peel or not to Peel
[ QUOTE ]
We have 5 outs to two-pair/trips and let's say 1 out for the back-door flush. We need 6.8-1 to call and we're not getting it. [/ QUOTE ] We are getting 6.5:1 pot odds, you don't believe in 0.15BBs of implied odds here?
|
|
#16
06-15-2005, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I voted no.....
[ QUOTE ]
I mentioned this before, but isn't at least one of your opponent's betting pattern consistent with 77 or 88? To which your 3 Qs and 2 3s are drawing dead. You should discount for this, too. Am I missing something? [/ QUOTE ] Don't forget 33. Pinlifter
|
|
#18
06-15-2005, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I voted no.....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1. There is a slim chance my Q and 3 outs are tainted(i.e. one of my opponents limped with A3 or Q8). [/ QUOTE ] I mentioned this before, but isn't at least one of your opponent's betting pattern consistent with 77 or 88? To which your 3 Qs and 2 3s are drawing dead. You should discount for this, too. Am I missing something? -k [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something? How can you put someone on a set given the action? It's possible, however there is absolutely no reason to fear it at this point in the hand.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
