Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:21 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Eesh. River value bet.

I dunno if this one's tough or interesting or what.

UTG limps. He's got ok stats but I haven't played against him much. I haven't seen him showing down a lot of stuff. Probably a little too passive overall.

MP limps. He's a weird brand of LAG that's really tough to identify. Plays about 80% of his hands and plays most of them aggressively (flop agg 1, turn agg 1.1, river agg 1.8). Bluffs on scary boards and non-scary boards, capable of bluff-checkraises. He is not a maniac, but does a lot of calling and a fair amount of bluffing. He's the reason I'm in the game.

CO limps. Slightly LAG player, this is a fairly wide range here. PF stats aren't incredibly loose or incredibly passive.

I limp behind on the button with 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].

SB completes. BB, a semi-lag preflop who slows down postflop (44/12) who I haven't seen much of postflop, now raises. Everyone calls. 6 to the flop for 12SB.

The flop is A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. Checked to me. Hmm. Something seems a bit strange with this flop but I bet anyway. I'm thinking a check isn't bad here but a bet probably has some value against the field. SB folds. BB calls. UTG folds. MP calls. CO folds.

3 to the turn for 15SB.

The turn is the 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Again, checked to me. I bet my frush. BB calls. MP calls.

The river is the 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Checked to me again. I check.

What do/don't we like?

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:28 PM
cockandbull cockandbull is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 571
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

im not sure you wrote this out correctly. seems to be a bad deck [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img].

As to the hand i think i'd check here vs two players.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:28 PM
SomethingClever SomethingClever is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

I like the whole thing. I don't try to squeeze a river value bet here if MP is capable of the tomfoolery you listed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:30 PM
cockandbull cockandbull is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 571
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

did you change the post or am i seeing things? i thought i saw two 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]'s.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:43 PM
imported_wingman imported_wingman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: walking by in slo-mo
Posts: 21
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

I would fold preflop. If most of these guys are LAG i don't think you get the free/cheap cards you need.

Post flop looks good.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-15-2005, 06:52 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

[ QUOTE ]
I would fold preflop. If most of these guys are LAG i don't think you get the free/cheap cards you need.

Post flop looks good.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think folding preflop when all these guys who are normally aggressive limp is probably a sizable mistake.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-15-2005, 07:06 PM
Fabian Fabian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 67
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

I bet the river.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2005, 07:10 PM
danng721 danng721 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

BB probably has a mid to high PP, MP could have a weak ace. Bet it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2005, 07:10 PM
marand marand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 94
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would fold preflop. If most of these guys are LAG i don't think you get the free/cheap cards you need.

Post flop looks good.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think folding preflop when all these guys who are normally aggressive limp is probably a sizable mistake.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

I think calling preflop is a mistake with this crap. Maybe not a big mistake, but I think it's slightly -EV. If you knew that the BB is LAG preflop also then it's a very clear mistake. The rest of the hand is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-15-2005, 07:21 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: Eesh. River value bet.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would fold preflop. If most of these guys are LAG i don't think you get the free/cheap cards you need.

Post flop looks good.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think folding preflop when all these guys who are normally aggressive limp is probably a sizable mistake.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

I think calling preflop is a mistake with this crap. Maybe not a big mistake, but I think it's slightly -EV. If you knew that the BB is LAG preflop also then it's a very clear mistake. The rest of the hand is fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

With 3 limpers who have below average hands, folding a hand like 97s is a pretty clear mistake -- I can't see how calling with 96s would be all that different. It's not a great hand by any stretch of the imagination, but if better players are saying that folding 75s with less limpers in this situation is an error, when we're getting better implied odds with a hand like 96s, I'm not clear how we dump it. BB is a mild lag, but that said, he's only raising about 12% of his hands, so I don't know that we're going to see a PFR from him -- especially in the BB -- often enough for it to make a huge impact on our profitability with this hand. The fact that everyone with the exception of MP is predictable postflop makes this an easier limp, FWIW.

It's far from a clear mistake, if it's a mistake at all.

Rob
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.