Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-12-2005, 03:55 AM
pshreck pshreck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
5000 is the expected wrong answer and 4100 is the real answer.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just think there is no way 98% of people (or even anywhere close to that) get 5000 over 4100. I'm no math genius or quizmaster and this was a quick 4100. I think there may be another trick answer, because the whole explanation seems wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-12-2005, 03:58 AM
Alobar Alobar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 795
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5000 is the expected wrong answer and 4100 is the real answer.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just think there is no way 98% of people (or even anywhere close to that) get 5000 over 4100. I'm no math genius or quizmaster and this was a quick 4100. I think there may be another trick answer, because the whole explanation seems wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont think its 98%, but I definately can see tons of people getting 5000.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:00 AM
PoBoy321 PoBoy321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 396
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
I think there may be another trick answer, because the whole explanation seems wrong.


[/ QUOTE ]

Huh? I think that it's just because when people read through the question quickly, they mistakenly read 10, 20, 30 and 40 as 100, 200, 300 and 400 to come up with a nice round answer at the end, instead of the awkward 4100 answer.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:01 AM
brassnuts brassnuts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 74
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5000 is the expected wrong answer and 4100 is the real answer.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just think there is no way 98% of people (or even anywhere close to that) get 5000 over 4100. I'm no math genius or quizmaster and this was a quick 4100. I think there may be another trick answer, because the whole explanation seems wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I agree that 98% just seems like a stupid statistic, but I'd bet it's much higher than you'd think. Someone asked me this question verbally maybe 10 years ago, and I remember saying 5000, and I'm very good at math. Actually, I'm only decent at arithmetic, but that's beside the point. If you take on this question not giving it much concentration, it would be easy to flub. I also think that giving it to someone verbally makes a difference too. Oh yeah, and most people are really dumb. I wouldn't be surprised if a good percent came up with a number beside 4100 or 5000 just cuz they can't add.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:02 AM
GoblinMason (Craig) GoblinMason (Craig) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Urbana, IL (UIUC)
Posts: 268
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

I got 4050. I don't know how.

-Craig
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:03 AM
pshreck pshreck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

I guess. I get the feeling that a lot of people lied in saying they got 4100 then? OP shouldn't have given the answer right away to make a point then. Everyone saying it was easy along with me getting 4100 (again no math genius just lucky) made me think that we are getting duped.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:04 AM
PoBoy321 PoBoy321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 396
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

Well, chances are that you also have to take into account the fact that most people on this board are probably more mathematically inclined than the general population.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:04 AM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

I don't know how anybody could get 5000.

Maybe it shows that most people just skim instead of read.

I wouldn't be surprised at all. It seems to be borne out conversationally.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:05 AM
brassnuts brassnuts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 74
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
Well, chances are that you also have to take into account the fact that most people on this board are probably more mathematically inclined than the general population.

[/ QUOTE ]

And are nits.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:05 AM
sk8erboy1 sk8erboy1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: This is ridiculous.

hmmmm [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.