#1
|
|||
|
|||
4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
Is it more profitable to 4 table party or play something like 3 tables on party and 1 on pacific?
Right now I 4 table party, but I was thinking of mixing it up with some other sites... Any suggestions? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
I have been doing the same thing recently trying to clear both of the bonuses. Pacific truly has some of the worst players I have seen. So many of them are loose passive/ passive it is unreal. If you could play more than one table at once it would literally be a goldmine.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
[ QUOTE ]
If you could play more than one table at once it would literally be a goldmine. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe not "literally" but I know what you mean. I would kill if I could 4 table Pacific. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
i'm sure the reason that pacific's games are so good is because you cannot 4 table.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
Maybe I should have asked "for those who 4 table, what sites do you select your 4 tables from?"
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
pacific = disconnections = -EV
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you could play more than one table at once it would literally be a goldmine. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe not "literally" but I know what you mean. I would kill if I could 4 table Pacific. [/ QUOTE ] so wouldn't alot of people. you wouldn't make as much then, i guess. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4 tables on party or 3 on party and 1 on pacific?
4 tables on party AND 1 on pacific. duh.
thread over. |
|
|