#1
|
|||
|
|||
I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 max, 9 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is CO with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls, MP1 calls. Flop: (6.50 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, MP1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls, MP1 calls. Turn: (4.75 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, MP1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, MP1 calls. River: (6.75 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> MP1 checks, Hero checks. Final Pot: 6.75 BB At the time I really didn't think a worse hand was calling me very often on this board, and the villain was particularly passive, so I checked behind, but I really think I should have value bet, since even if villain is rarely calling here, he's also probably never check raising, so it seems like a bet is OK now that I've had time to think about it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
So if he's rarely calling, its not really a value bet. If there is no chance he will call there is no point of betting.
Now say u were to switch positions, I like a check from MP1. As if u bet, he will fold or raise, or call. If u check, he may check behind, but he could bet, and u call. Its more +EV to check if you are first to act. Well against a more aggressive player it is. Passive play you'd want to bet. Calling station you'd want to bet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
oreogod i found your post confusing. I would value bet this. What do u think villian has? Which busted draw? Was he ace chasing with a crappy kicker? I think he is calling down with a pair lower than yours or with a weaker kicker. He will call on the river IMO
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
OP said he will rarely call. NM misread it.
I did say to bet against a passive/calling station player, though. Gist of my previous post: 1.Bet against passive/calling stations. (Unless u believe your hand has less than a 50 percent chance of being ahead, in which case a check behind is better) 2.When OOP if u think u have 50 percent chance of having the best hand against an aggressive opponent, its +EV to check. NM, my post is all screwed up and is just talking about river play in general. Sorry. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
Simply put, if you're not betting this river you're not making a lot of extra money.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
[ QUOTE ]
Simply put, if you're not betting this river you're not making a lot of extra money. [/ QUOTE ] This post is Hemmingway to my Ulysses. Much more streamlined, but it was what I was trying to say, just not in readable form. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am a Weak Tight Baby (KQo)
yeah when i think about what i actually wrote it just sounds weird.
ps. bet. river. |
|
|