![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I call down, but I dont like it much.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see absolutely no way that you can fold here.
My line would be to call down, or maybe lead te river. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about 44 or 33? Or if he's a passive PF player 99 is a possibility. I'd call it down, if I'm right I note his bad slow play and be ok w/ the call.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Hero proceeds to badly misplay the rest of the hand. [/ QUOTE ] So far Hero has played this hand as he should. I hope he calls down from here. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
How about 44 or 33? Or if he's a passive PF player 99 is a possibility. I'd call it down, if I'm right I note his bad slow play and be ok w/ the call. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think we can assume Button is checking the flop through with a set. Most players will bet (and should). |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The pot is tiny [/ QUOTE ] The pot is 6.5 BB. We're ahead of CO and Button is raising TP with a worse kicker often enough to call down. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I'd either be 3-betting the turn or stop n go the river on most cards. [/ QUOTE ] You can't fold to a turn cap, but check/fold the river UI. I don't like the turn 3-bet since it will cost more than calling down and without getting a showdown (if we get capped). I can see a point in betting the river though. We're most often up against JT/QT/AT here but adding the risk of being up against slowplayed 33 or 44 (hands which will always raise the river and we won't be able to fold) I like just check/calling a little better. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your options:
Fold: You have top pair with a good kicker. You have no read on the opponent. Folding is plain wrong IMHO. If he has a set, then your drawing dead. I think, more often than not, your going to see hands like J10, Q10, and A10. He's not slowplaying 910 on the flop. It could be an overpair played like a donk. Call: This is your best option. There are 6.5 BB in the pot, so you don't need to have the best hand a majority of the time for it to be profitable. Raise: This would just be silly. You leave yourself open to a cap and trap yourself to a river bet as well. Don't do this. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The pot is tiny, fold to the turn raise. Easy fold. [/ QUOTE ] are you serious here? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I was serious when I posted it. Maybe not the part about the "easy" fold, but a fold seems somewhat reasonable. I'm still not convinced that folding is terrible because of the size of the pot--readless though, I admit its tougher. But yes, if I don't fold its a fairly clear call down. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some great replies here - I am indebted to all of you.
Well here's what I did, and why I still think it was wrong (although after reading the replies I'm starting to agree that it's not as egregious as I initially thought it was). My starting point in situations like these is that a turn raise, especially with players already in for one bet, usually means that the raiser can beat top pair. While this was only a three-way pot, both other players (myself included) were already in for a bet, so I thought I was likely facing two pair or a set. Having said that, it was also possible that Villain thought I was just trying to take down the pot given that the flop was checked around. I think however that I was just rationalizing a call that, in my heart, I knew was bad. *Anyway*, I called the turn, spiked a King on the river and check-called hoping Villain would bet a lesser two pair. But no, he showed 44. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Obviously he was wrong to slowplay middle set like he did but I think I made it less wrong for him by not getting away from my hand like I should have. Having said that, those of you who advocate calling down make a good case for it. I still think I misplayed this, just not as badly as I had previously thought. |
![]() |
|
|