|
|
#21
06-08-2005, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sure as h3ll higher than mine.[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I didn't realize 4.5/100 justified a move up ASAP. [/ QUOTE ] 4.5 is quite good. It is almost certainly better than that of most people posting or lurking here. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] i seem to remember -7.61/100 as the average loss from rake, so +4.5 is absolutely slaughtering the competition. 33k is kind of a lot of hands to be beating your opponents by 12bb/100. she should definitely move up. [/ QUOTE ] This rate of loss to the rake is wrong. If you look at your pokertracker stats your loss to the rake will be much less then your total won if you are winnign 4BB/100. It should be more like -1.5BB/100 Greg 
|
|
#25
06-08-2005, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
[ QUOTE ]
What was your own win-rate at $0.5/$1? [/ QUOTE ] 2,807 hands -0.01BB/100 hands. The total loss was $38.42. Obviously, I was too talented for the idiots who'd outdraw me with every piece-of-[censored] hand you can imagine. I quickly moved up.
|
|
#26
06-08-2005, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
[ QUOTE ]
2,807 hands -0.01BB/100 hands. The total loss was $38.42. Obviously, I was too talented for the idiots who'd outdraw me with every piece-of-[censored] hand you can imagine. [/ QUOTE ] Obviously. I'll also say what your deepest fears may suspect is true, your girlfriend is quite possibly a better poker player than you.
|
|
#27
06-08-2005, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2,807 hands -0.01BB/100 hands. The total loss was $38.42. Obviously, I was too talented for the idiots who'd outdraw me with every piece-of-[censored] hand you can imagine. [/ QUOTE ] Obviously. I'll also say what your deepest fears may suspect is true, your girlfriend is quite possibly a better poker player than you. [/ QUOTE ] I concur.
|
|
#28
06-08-2005, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
No offense, as I take it this post is made somewhat in jest, but if you don't know if she's ready to move up, and you think she has littlt to no talent with a 4BB WR, and she only plays tight/aggressive poker, then maybe you need to move down.
|
|
#29
06-08-2005, 03:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 2,807 hands -0.01BB/100 hands. The total loss was $38.42. Obviously, I was too talented for the idiots who'd outdraw me with every piece-of-[censored] hand you can imagine. [/ QUOTE ] Obviously. I'll also say what your deepest fears may suspect is true, your girlfriend is quite possibly a better poker player than you. [/ QUOTE ] I concur. [/ QUOTE ] yep, possibly by a good margin too
|
|
#30
06-08-2005, 03:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.5 BB/100 after 32,000 hands @ $0.5/$1.00 (is she any good?)
[ QUOTE ]
No offense, as I take it this post is made somewhat in jest, [/ QUOTE ] It's definitely starting to look like it's a joke thread. Which makes the OP either a) Pathetic for starting a thread to make some lame joke that no one gets (or thinks is funny), or b) Even more pathetic if he's serious.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
