#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't agree with you. It is my opinion that Daniel is playing his own money. In fact, this is more than just an opinion. I have a private source that I can't comment any more on. So you'll just have to take my word for it even though I'm not absolutely certain. [/ QUOTE ] If hes playing $500,000 HU matches out of a $10,000,000 roll he has either got a serious gambling problem or is an idiot. Mack [/ QUOTE ] By most defintions he has a problem, but it's negated by his skill. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
[ QUOTE ]
There is a mercurial girth to the ostentatious melatonin of his vernacularistic (yet curiously malevolent) onomatopaeia. [/ QUOTE ] Sure, that's easy for you to say. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
Thank you for admitting i win. You are a bigger man that i thought.
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
I am assuming these guys are fairly evenly matched. Whoever is favored can't be more than a 60-40 favorite meaning each should win at least two or three matches. More likely one is a 53-47 favorite meaning whoever wins got lucky over a short series.
Big egos. Big money. Go boys! |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
You want Danny to be the man so bad you give ridiculous stats. You show me 13 total sessions and tell me his hourly rate for that game is 4k plus an hour? Is that all we need to figure out our hourly rate? I see how it works. I ran good for a couple weeks at 15-30. I think my hourly was 200 an hour. I guess thats what i make than right? I mean i did it over a WHOLE 13 sessions.
Barry G. plays that game day in and day out. And is on tape saying Danny is not one of the top players in his game. And unproven. And he says the other players agree with him. Yet you want us to believe you and Danny because of 13 sessions. And i wonder if Daniel would have posted his results if he had a bad 13 sessions? I got a guess. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
Unintentional stupidity at its finest.
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
Yes his problem is his ego.
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
What does this have to do with it? That is a very poor reply. I shouldn't even have to answer this. Because someone is known means they don't want to promote themselves more to make more money? I guess Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise, and others must be unknowns because they seem to always promote there movies to make more money. And surely they would not do this if people knew who they were right?
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
Remember on In Living Color, when Damon Wayans (back when it looked lke he might actually have a career) had that character in prison, the guy who I guess was "self-taught" while doing time, and he was always misusing words, and then correcting himself incorrectly?
Man, that was some funny stuff. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4.5 million
Rise, chicken. Rise. Chicken. Chicken. Rise.
|
|
|