|
|
#13
05-31-2005, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too frisky?
As it turns out the OP was ahead until the river. The hero is going to take this down so often that it's worth noting that despite everyone's fears, it was only a desperate longshot that could beat him. To repeat, the hero was a huge favorite through the whole hand. Raise! Raise! Raise!
|
|
#14
05-31-2005, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: too frisky?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I put BB on a flopped straight. I would call down from there. [/ QUOTE ] That makes no sense... [/ QUOTE ] I thought UTG's play reeked of slowplay, as he waited to pop the turn. Meh, shows what I know...
|
|
#15
05-31-2005, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: too frisky?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I put BB on a flopped straight. I would call down from there. [/ QUOTE ] That makes no sense... [/ QUOTE ] I thought UTG's play reeked of slowplay, as he waited to pop the turn. Meh, shows what I know... [/ QUOTE ] So why call down with top pair weak kicker? Your initial read was curious, your recommendation based on that read was curious as well.
|
|
#16
05-31-2005, 04:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: too frisky?
[ QUOTE ]
Ummm, T9 is not a straight, it's a flush. Add that guy to your buddy list. The pot was too small for him to even call on the flop. 5:1 for two medium overcards and a backdoor flush is not nearly good enough. He was basically counting his overcards as 3 outs each, or not counting at all. [/ QUOTE ] Villain had gutshot also.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
