Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-30-2005, 03:46 AM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 412
Default Re: Does Dan Harrington have a name on 2+2 if so what is it?

i'll admit, it probably wasn't very funny.

and it's dan slansky, not sklansky.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-30-2005, 10:29 AM
schafdawg schafdawg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6
Default Re: Does Dan Harrington have a name on 2+2 if so what is it?

[ QUOTE ]
i'll admit, it probably wasn't very funny.

and it's dan slansky, not sklansky.

[/ QUOTE ]

So who's the guy who helps run this website? http://www.twoplustwo.com

Is this "David Sklansky" who co-authored SSHE some hack trying to imitate Dan Slansky?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-30-2005, 07:59 PM
michiganfan9 michiganfan9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 129
Default Re: Does Dan Harrington have a name on 2+2 if so what is it?

This is probably why howard lederer and others don't post anymore because we have people barading others with critisism over the dumbest things.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-31-2005, 12:04 PM
BoxLiquid BoxLiquid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 81
Default Re: Does Dan Harrington have a name on 2+2 if so what is it?

[ QUOTE ]
To date, all of the 2+2 authors have posted here under their own names. Dan's co-author posts here under the name "Robertie".

Many pros (Annie Duke, Howard Lederer, etc.) have posted here in the past under their own names, but have not been around for awhile. Based on what I have seen here, they stopped posting because of personal abuse by a few small minds who had no interest in learning from them, but only in inflating their own pathetic egos.

[/ QUOTE ]


That is so damn sad. So much potential knowledge we could've learned gone to waste.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-31-2005, 02:49 PM
GreywolfNYC GreywolfNYC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 290
Default Re: Does Dan Harrington have a name on 2+2 if so what is it?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
To date, all of the 2+2 authors have posted here under their own names. Dan's co-author posts here under the name "Robertie".

Many pros (Annie Duke, Howard Lederer, etc.) have posted here in the past under their own names, but have not been around for awhile. Based on what I have seen here, they stopped posting because of personal abuse by a few small minds who had no interest in learning from them, but only in inflating their own pathetic egos.

[/ QUOTE ]


That is so damn sad. So much potential knowledge we could've learned gone to waste.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right, like an enire thread criticizing Jennifer Harman for what she wore at a final table, along with comments from a couple of 2+2 eunuchs that she had "flabby arms."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-31-2005, 06:29 PM
benfranklin benfranklin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 155
Default Re: Does Dan Harrington have a name on 2+2 if so what is it?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
To date, all of the 2+2 authors have posted here under their own names. Dan's co-author posts here under the name "Robertie".

Many pros (Annie Duke, Howard Lederer, etc.) have posted here in the past under their own names, but have not been around for awhile. Based on what I have seen here, they stopped posting because of personal abuse by a few small minds who had no interest in learning from them, but only in inflating their own pathetic egos.

[/ QUOTE ]


That is so damn sad. So much potential knowledge we could've learned gone to waste.

[/ QUOTE ]

Annie's comments on the TOC (available at ther website here ) gave some great insights into a pro's thought processes at the tournament table. I'd love to see a Q&A thread here following up on that.

But pros who post here do so at the risk of a bunch of mental midgets trying to pull them down to their own level, complete with personal insults and name calling. Women are particularly vulnerable, with discussions about their looks and bodies and personal relationships, and pimply faced geeks who never hit anything but themselves debating whether they would "hit that".

Good argument for a separate moderated strategy forum here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.