#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
Any of you 6-tabling tags playing NL?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
I 8-table the party 2/4 and can chat at the same time or talk with a friend [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] No problemos. I would probably 12 table if I had one monitor more [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
no i dont play nl. i really dont know how some people 4table+ nl games. reads are so much more important in those games than pt stats.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
[ QUOTE ]
no i dont play nl. i really dont know how some people 4table+ nl games. reads are so much more important in those games than pt stats. [/ QUOTE ] i 8 tabled the 2-4 400 max on party/empire for a week when i was taking a break from sngs. its cake. people play awful. you dont need to make a read. just play agressive. period. pot preflop, pot the flop. the fold too much. tough to NOT make money. holla |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
ok, i 12 table the 109s and 55s and occasionally 215s on 3 empire accounts. somehow i found my way to the internet gambling link.. i usually stick to the stt forum. anyways, my winrate drops, but i dont know by how much. i dont really care. if i break even, i make 50k+ a year in rakeback. tough to complain with that..
in stts, you dont need to make a lot of reads. once you figure out how to play and read stack sizes and recognize bubble situations, its lal a matter of how fast you can click. eventually, i will 14 table, but im too lazy. 12 is getting to be normal now, and i can chat online a bit while doing it. holla |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
[ QUOTE ]
Do you get used to it after a while and get to a rate faster than this? Shauna [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I do about 550 an hour. Krishan |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
[ QUOTE ]
Any of you 6-tabling tags playing NL? [/ QUOTE ] I'm playing 12 tables NL25 on a 1280x1024 monitor. My win rate actually improves at 8+ tables. I need to be busy constantly, if not, i'm starting to get bored and surf 2+2 and such, and that really destroys my focus. When playing 12 tables i don't have time for that, and therefor my focus is greatly increased. 12 tables usually averages to about 750hands/hour. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
Since you begin to multi table(I guess), I think that you really should have 1600x1200. Because the table are all near each other so you can follow each of them.
I would've learn slower to multi table doing your way. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
orca, could you provide a screenshot by any chance? ive never heard of anyone 12tabling on 1 1280x1024 before and would probably find this hysterically impressive.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question for 6+ tablers . . .
[ QUOTE ]
orca, could you provide a screenshot by any chance? ive never heard of anyone 12tabling on 1 1280x1024 before and would probably find this hysterically impressive. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think a screenshot will provide much info [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] But look in this thread, it's got a link to a short video showing the action. I can make a higher resolution one if you want. |
|
|