Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 05-24-2005, 11:05 PM
DeadIsARetard DeadIsARetard is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: I heard ^ fucked a goat
Posts: 19
Default Re: An psych experiment on the OOT crowd....

[ QUOTE ]
no. dead is a retard and i am not.

[/ QUOTE ]


fyp

-DiaR
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 05-25-2005, 01:56 AM
lorinda lorinda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: England
Posts: 2,478
Default Re: An psych experiment on the OOT crowd....

"Yeah, thats as good as it gets for our intents and purposes. "

It may be a good idea if you repeat this anywhere to link to a coin flipping program somewhere to maximize the odds that people will actually consider moving off their chair.

Edit: I realise that you are saying repeatedly that it doesn't matter, but I think it would also lower the chances that they bother to lie about doing it or not.

Lori
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 05-25-2005, 09:07 AM
k000k k000k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 109
Default Re: An psych experiment on the OOT crowd....

[ QUOTE ]
By the way, given a sufficiently large sample size (maybe >1 million), I think that even the lists made by random number generators could be spotted from those made using a "fair" coin. I've done tests on this, and I get some pretty strange results. i.e. 80% of flips after 7 consecutive "heads" result in another heads (over 1000 flips) and things of that sort.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not true, I did extensive research for 2 semesters in RNG's using many different tests and methods to determine how random data is, including obvious tests like arithmetic mean, and much more sophisticated tests like entropy, chi square distribution, monte carlo pi value, and serial correlation. I personally tested billions of 'random' bits hundreds of times over the year, and what's returned by the C rand() function is indistinguishable from true random data. If it could be determined that C rand() returns non-random values, it'd take a more than trillions of bits to tell.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.