|
|
#1
05-15-2005, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Gt+ vs PV: CPU usage
Hey all,
Im sure this has been touched on before, but I searched and couldnt find quite what I was looking for I currently use GT+. I just switched to 8 tables, and have found that Gt+ chugs on my computer (kinda old... like an athlon 1800 or so, with 1GB RAM). Is PV the same with as many tables, or is it less of a CPU hog? 
|
|
#2
05-16-2005, 10:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gt+ vs PV: CPU usage
[ QUOTE ]
Hey all, Im sure this has been touched on before, but I searched and couldnt find quite what I was looking for I currently use GT+. I just switched to 8 tables, and have found that Gt+ chugs on my computer (kinda old... like an athlon 1800 or so, with 1GB RAM). Is PV the same with as many tables, or is it less of a CPU hog? [/ QUOTE ] Since GT+ is very small, it is unlikely the problem is the memory footprint. Programs like GT+ and PV update their data from PT, so what is probably happening is that the demand on your HD has increased significantly, which in turn is slowing down your computer overall.
|
|
#3
05-20-2005, 08:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gt+ vs PV: CPU usage
[ QUOTE ]
Hey all, Im sure this has been touched on before, but I searched and couldnt find quite what I was looking for I currently use GT+. I just switched to 8 tables, and have found that Gt+ chugs on my computer (kinda old... like an athlon 1800 or so, with 1GB RAM). Is PV the same with as many tables, or is it less of a CPU hog? [/ QUOTE ] upgrade to gt+ version 1.4.3, supposedly it runs a lot faster
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
