Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:05 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: weird hand

i really dont think i can fold top 2 pair here. i think UTG will have a set more often than he has other hands, but i dont know him well enough. he could easily have many other hands like 67 or a smaller aces up. folding this here would be ridiculous.

i also dont think 3betting the turn is close. doesnt make sense. i lose an extra bet when behind to UTG and i eliminate the BB when hes drawing to 3 outs.


looking back, nate is right. i definitely should have folded this preflop. my policy from the sb is that once i complete, im not going to fold if the bb raises. obviously this is flawed, especially in situations like this. its habit for me to autocall this, but certainly wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:24 PM
albanat0r albanat0r is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Default Re: weird hand

I disagree. Getting 5/1 odds with an ace preflop warrants a call, unless you can say with absolute certainty that BB has a big pair or big ace.

The flop you played fine.

The turn you should have reraised if you put BB on an ace. The pot is already decent enough to protect, and you gotta make him draw if he wants to hit his kicker, which he probably will at these limits with a high ace. As it turns out that wasn't the case, but that's what any thinking player would have him on. You also can't put UTG on a set enough to not put in another raise with top 2- I would have him on the same or lower two pair, a monster draw, or depending on how weak he plays preflop a big ace. You simply can't slow down on the turn with this many draws on the board when you are most likely ahead.

The river checkraise was great because you had intended on calling down the UTG bet, but after things played out differently you made a great read.

Under no circumstances would I have considered folding at any point in this hand.


Lee
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:26 PM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: weird hand

Nate, if the BB had a more normal PFR, say 10-20, would you fold as well?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:27 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: weird hand

i would cap the turn with the intention of putting only 1 bet in on the riv.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:28 PM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: weird hand

[ QUOTE ]
I disagree. Getting 5/1 odds with an ace preflop warrants a call, unless you can say with absolute certainty that BB has a big pair or big ace.

[/ QUOTE ]

The guy raises 1% of his hands. We're drawing to three outs at best out of position in a bad implied odds situation.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:29 PM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: weird hand

[ QUOTE ]
Nate, if the BB had a more normal PFR, say 10-20, would you fold as well?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd probably call but wouldn't like it very much.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:29 PM
SGS SGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 56
Default Re: weird hand

With this hand you have a lot of reverse implied odds to go with your hand. Flop comes 7 high as it did you may be up against an overpair. Flop comes A high you may be up against a bigger A. It will not be easy to get away from either of these situations and therefore I think this would be a tough hand to play out of position against a PF raiser. I think this makes it a fold.

SGS
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:37 PM
albanat0r albanat0r is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Default Re: weird hand

You're right Nate, didn't see the 1% part.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.