|
|
#11
05-15-2005, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: T9s
LOL
|
|
#12
05-15-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: T9s
you are a fish.
|
|
#13
05-15-2005, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: T9s
[ QUOTE ]
Well played. Never slow down when your pattern mapper tells you you're going to end up with the nuts. Edit: 3bet the turn. [/ QUOTE ] LMAO!
|
|
#14
05-15-2005, 09:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: T9s
Hehe [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
At least OP prolly won't be responsible for any kitten deaths [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#16
05-15-2005, 10:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: T9s
Man thats a huge POT 40BB
Anyways I'm somewhat uncertain here but I really think I'd go for a fold on the flop due to all the raises. And I don't count your either of your pocekts live outs so this doesn't live you with much. Two backdoors is approx 3 outs then I'll give you one more for catching two pair or three of a kind. a Total of four outs. I think I prefer a fold on the flop, maybe a call but certainly not a raise. I don't like turn either the 7 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] would have justified a raise, but you are first to act and givin the action on the other streets you could end up facing two more bets. Nice backdoor catch on the river though (Anyone feel fre to correct my thoughts if I'm wrong on this one)
|
|
#19
05-15-2005, 11:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: T9s
[ QUOTE ]
Preflop is standardisingly standard. [/ QUOTE ] I dunno; it's pretty thin.
|
|
#20
05-16-2005, 06:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: T9s
Preflop is IMO a whole lot worse than just "pretty thin."
Bear in mind that suited connectors flop two pair or a big draw only a tad over 10% of the time; they need several players AND implied odds. You've already gone -EV on this hand by getting only 4 players and being out of position. Now on top of that, you've wiped out your implied odds by having to pay 3 times the usual price to see a flop. Not just a muck, but an easy muck.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
