ONLINE POKER IS 100% RIGGED

[stockman]

????

[viennagreen]

stockman,

i'm a little embarrassed to be getting sucked into this warped thread but----

You've "did big studies"--- let's see them... wait--- let's just see what the "standard deviation of the variance" in your results are. What are the "mathematically possible to exist" standard deviation of the variance('s?) ?

Why am I comfortable asking these questions? Because you have done no "big studies" and you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.

A mathematically-oriented person would know these answers before jumping to your conclusions. Post them.

You won't though, because you are no genius. You, like so many other people, have an inflated opinion of your own abilities. If you fail at something, it must be due to some external factor rather than your own internal faults.

Here's your chance to shine though, genius. Post some math. I know you can't prove that the sites are rigged--- but, at a minimum, show us from a theoretical point what results would give us confidence that the sites are rigged.

Okay i have an solution for you!

You are the best player in the world.
Why dont you play on tables with only good players, whom all in the losing mode, then you are still winning becouse you are the better player!

[mybutthurts]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess when I signed up I was one of the lucky ones that they decided to put in permanent win mode. Happened at all three sites I've played. What luck!

eastbay

[/ QUOTE ],,,,<<<<liar

[mybutthurts]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My name is Gabe, maybe you see me on the WSOP, Im a professional cash player thats sick of the mafia run online poker business. If you could show me any evidence or ANYONE thats ever made money from online poker, Ill show you ocean front property in Nebraska

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know why I'm bothering with you because you're obviously an idiot or a troll or both.

But, here's your evidence:



I'm sure a real braniac like you is smart enough to do the math to figure out the probability that I am a winning player in these games after these 1272 tournaments which span about 6 months' time. I guess they didn't kick me into "distribution" mode over this period? Come on, man, that's black helicopter tinfoil hat stuff.

Tons of people win online. If you don't, it's because you are playing worse than your opponents. Period. Maybe you should try moving down in limits. You will see that the lower level games are softer, and you will prove to yourself that you can win.

Here's something most B&M don't want to accept: the play online is generally much TOUGHER than the play in B&M casinos, despite what the B&M casino guys love to think. I know because I play both.

eastbay


[/ QUOTE ]<<<big liar couldnt win if hole cards were face up.

[mybutthurts]

[ QUOTE ]
Tell me one thing, why is everything else ive said idiotic. I dont understand that comment. Ill tell you that i know a lot of things that exist in this country that most people dont belive, they always laugh or ignore it to live in there own little world & think everybody is trustworthy & out for a good cause, but almost anything to do with big money is rigged. If you dont think the government is run by the mob, then you have a lot to learn. All big corporations are run by the same people, the same sit on their boards & own the majority of their stock. They can & will do anything to take my & your money. I cant really prove to you that online poker is rigged, but i can tell you that i know absolutely 100% sure that it is.

[/ QUOTE ]<<< these are the words of a true genius.

[bicyclekick]

[ QUOTE ]
Ripped, Im well aware of that, I have a 6 max starting hand chart with exactly which hands are mathmatically correct to play from wich positions & what you should be calling raises with etc. or coming in raising with, most are fold or raise situations. I rarely limp these games, im raising or folding. Most players should be profitable just sticking to this because the players are so bad, Im a very good short handed player or ring & considermyself as good as anyone. There are no leaks in my game that i know of, just up against rigged poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can find a leak just from reading your post. You've got this "mathamtical chart" of which hands to play as if the game conditions/opponents never changed. Right.

I'm sure you just suck at poker and that's that.

I have a huge DB that shows with 99%+ confidence (based on standard devaiations) that I'm a winning player online. Would that shut you up?

[Mike Haven]

I dont know what that is or where it came from

It's a screenshot from PokerTracker.

There may be a few, (but very few), online poker winners that don't use it, simply for relaxed study of their own game, if not directly to choose games in which to play.

I cannot understand how anyone that has played seriously online for any length of time has not at least come across it in their general studies and reading and doesn't even know what it is; yet, in other posts, writes confidently that they have no leaks, because they have a chart.

Give us a break.

[Mike Haven]

John Juanda told me i was one of the best players he had ever played with & most of the pros Ive played with thought the same, but still cant win online

Write to JJ at FTP and tell him that because you are such a high profile good player FTP is getting bad publicity by turning on their doom switch for you, because you are really a good guy at heart and you are going round all the internet forums warning potential players and giving them the proof that as you are now losing then internet poker must be rigged.

Tell him you'll keep quiet if they turn the dial round just a notch so you are at least a beat-the-rake winner.

I can't see him objecting to that for someone like you.

Tell him you think that hundreds of forum-readers throughout the world would be in favour of this solution to stop you posting and let you get back to the game. Hell, tell him you'll even join in his game again so he can continue to compliment your nice hands.

[zaphod]

Come on, we all know this guy is right. The proof is here:

proof