|
|
#1
05-10-2005, 01:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
55 raise UTG
Are you more likely to raise 55 (and other low-mid pps) from UTG than to open-raise them from middle position, as UTG gets more respect (and more folds)? Or is it pretty standard from any position
|
|
#2
05-10-2005, 01:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 55 raise UTG
[ QUOTE ]
Are you more likely to raise 55 (and other low-mid pps) from UTG than to open-raise them from middle position, as UTG gets more respect (and more folds)? Or is it pretty standard from any position [/ QUOTE ] I dont think its very standard UTG at all. Pretty table dependant. And no Im not more likely to raise it UTG just becasue UTG gets more respect.
|
|
#3
05-10-2005, 04:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 55 raise UTG
[ QUOTE ]
Are you more likely to raise 55 (and other low-mid pps) from UTG than to open-raise them from middle position, as UTG gets more respect (and more folds)? Or is it pretty standard from any position [/ QUOTE ] thats a good changeup but by NO MEANS a standard play. not a good idea because on average its -EV. but i've come to like 55 because i pulled a change up and it worked: james282 raises UTG i 3bet in UTG+1 w/ 55. he calls flop is AQ4 he check folds...and had a pair higher than 5s. of course he said doing that is 'bad' but that doing it once in a while is fine ... otherwise he knows i can never have a set if the flop is 235 and mercilessly pound me w/ his aces if thats the case. so yea, 55 is fine to raise utg for a change up but i've never done it online. -Barron
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
