|
|
#1
05-06-2005, 11:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
different limits: Do you play \'em differently
I seem to do better at 5/10 versus 2/4 (or at 4/8 versus 3/6) in evaluating my play, I think that I am playing too loose at the lower limts: for example, if 5 people are in on the flop, then AXs (or 33) plays for a SB (small bet), which means I end up limping in lower-limit and get caught 'sideways'...interested in how others diferentiate how they play lowerlimet versus higher limit, cause I ain't doing it right...
|
|
#2
05-07-2005, 07:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: different limits: Do you play \'em differently
I do find myself playing differently based on the quality of my opponents. That's not necessarily a limit issue but, on the whole, lower limits have worse players.
SpaceAce
|
|
#3
05-07-2005, 06:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: different limits: Do you play \'em differently
How you play, or adjust your play, really has absolutely nothing to do with the limit you're playing.
Quit thinking monetarily. b
|
|
#4
05-07-2005, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: different limits: Do you play \'em differently
[ QUOTE ]
I seem to do better at 5/10 versus 2/4 (or at 4/8 versus 3/6) in evaluating my play, I think that I am playing too loose at the lower limts: for example, if 5 people are in on the flop, then AXs (or 33) plays for a SB (small bet), which means I end up limping in lower-limit and get caught 'sideways'...interested in how others diferentiate how they play lowerlimet versus higher limit, cause I ain't doing it right... [/ QUOTE ] any suited ace and any pocket pair is a easy call in the SB when its 5 limpers to you.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
