Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-05-2005, 06:30 AM
deepsquat deepsquat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 505
Default 99 vs 3bet

CO was VPIP 59% PFR 25% after 67 hands. Aggression factor of 1.06

He is obviously quite LAGGY but i hadnt really noticed him.

I got a bit lost here, i was contemplating a turn raise but chose to fold. I think this was a bad decision in this pot, opinions?

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. MP3 posts a blind of $0.75.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO 3-bets</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls, MP2 calls.

Flop: (18 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button calls, UTG+1 folds, Hero calls, MP2 calls.

I bet out to see how much CO liked his hand, and also for his raise to possibly clear the field.

Turn: (13 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, Button folds, Hero folds, MP2 folds.

Final Pot: 14 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2005, 06:41 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

No way I'm folding this hand the way it went down. In fact, you played this hand very poorly (hense the post). The key point in the hand is the flop bet and how the CO will react to it. For the sake of argument, let's say that he can either auto raise the flop or just raise the flop with hands that beat yours (and call with something like AK).

If he will only raise the flop with hands that beat yours, you played it fine. His flop raise tells you that your nines aren't the best hand and you correctly call the flop raise for set value and then fold the turn UI. Since you posted the hand, I don't think that this is the case. Typical LAGGY types will raise lots of different hands on the flop, including those that you can beat. So if you bet into him with the intention of getting it HU with a hand that might have you beat but might be drawing to 6 outs, the turn fold is horrible. What you have to determine is...which hands will he raise on the flop? If you think that he will blow everyone away with AK, you have to call this down. Yeah you will sometimes see AA or QQ, but you will often times get shown UI AJ or 77 or whatever.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:13 AM
deepsquat deepsquat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 505
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

Thanks Brad, it felt like a bad fold.

I would have to think given his stats that my 99's would have to be good often enough to warrant see a SD in this pot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:36 AM
ArturiusX ArturiusX is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

Pot Size: 13BB

This is the key. Call this baby down.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:54 AM
martinimagic martinimagic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 67
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

My line with the LAGs in this situation is to err with aggression. Raising is my first choice and if 3-bet then call it down. Calling it down from the turn is a good choice, but folding is out of the question.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2005, 08:15 AM
ajrenni ajrenni is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

An aggression factor of 1.06 isn't that high, particularly if his 25% pfr is included. He seems to be slowing down after the flop for the most part.

I would probably check-call the flop. When CO raises there is now 21 SB in the pot, so Button and UTG+1 are getting good odds to call gutshots and bottom pair w/ overcard anyway. If an overcard comes on the turn, your hand is screwed whether CO has you beat on the flop or not. If a blank falls, a bet on the turn would give worse odds to callers, particularly if CO raises you. Or you could check-raise to try and knock out MP2.

I think the turn call is one of those deals where the pot is big enough to justify chasing. 14:1 is enough, considering that you still might be ahead of overcards. Having raised the flop and gotten 3-bet, I would not raise the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:19 AM
CEE CEE is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

I probably would have called down, or raised, given his PF aggression. It's fairly likely (better than 20 to 2) that he is playing AK or AJ or something rather than a pocket pair higher than yours. Discount that a little by the possibility that he has made a set with a lower PP or was playing AT and hit his pair.

I always love it when a guy is raising more hands than I play...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:22 AM
Luv2DriveTT Luv2DriveTT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

Nice flop bet, good thought process. Sad you had to fold the turn after you stared off so good.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:24 AM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 368
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

[ QUOTE ]
An aggression factor of 1.06 isn't that high,

[/ QUOTE ]

Remember, his VPIP is ~60%. He's in there with absolute garbage, but yet is still betting/raising about as often as he's folding. This implies that he is likely getting way out of line with trash.

A 60% VP player with AF = 1.0 is probably more maniacally aggressive than a 17% VP player with AF = 3.0. When a tight player is aggressive, you at least know he has a hand that warrants it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:35 AM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: 99 vs 3bet

with those kind of stats I am wanting to show this hand down. This is a good flop for your 99's and the pot is big.
I would have 3 bet the flop. This would give us an idea of where he is, also it may get a fold or two.
If he caps then I may fold turn ui, or call down if low cards fall.
This is read dependent, but against this guy I want to get it heads up and I want to show down with him. I think he could have AK, AQ, 77
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.