Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier

[HelloGoodbye]

... for limit 2/4 to 5/10?

[GoblinMason (Craig)]

I'm pretty sure Pacific is softer, but the software is just so terrible that the slightly worse games at PP make it worth playing at PP instead.

-Craig

[The4Aces]

pacific is pretty soft but you can only play one table at once.

[reubenf]

pacific is pretty soft but you can only play half of a table at once.

[neotope]

I'm playing on Pacific right now, the games are good but the software sucks. As soon as I clear this bonus I'm done [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[HelloGoodbye]

I actually signed up for Pacific 3 weeks ago, and haven't played on Party yet. I've had a ridiculously good run, and I'm sure part of it's the cards, but I could not believe how bad the play is.

The whole no multi-tabling thing doesn't bother me much, as I'm not a big into that, and can always bring up another site at the same time anyways. The only thing that really bothers me is there isn't SH tables for 2/4 or 3/6.

[Kevin K.]

[ QUOTE ]
The only thing that really bothers me is there isn't SH tables for 2/4 or 3/6.

[/ QUOTE ]

Party doesn't have SH tables at these limits, either.