#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What\'s the point of first 3 levels in high buy-in SNGs?
A lot of people can't get away from it at the 55s, I can attest to that. Dunno about 109+.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What\'s the point of first 3 levels in high buy-in SNGs?
[ QUOTE ]
A lot of people can't get away from it at the 55s, I can attest to that. Dunno about 109+. [/ QUOTE ] Good players probably shouldn't get away from it at the lower limits. Laying down top pair depends a lot on your assessment of the probability of bluffing and the probability of bad players pushing middle/bottom pairs. In the lower limits it could be +EV to hold onto but horribly -EV to hold onto in higher limits. I play at the 109s and I think it is borderline what to do there [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Pokerscott |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What\'s the point of first 3 levels in high buy-in SNGs?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Taking a shot at flopping the nuts, or reading people post flop? [/ QUOTE ] Not necessarily flopping the nuts, but flopping a good enough hand that you likely have the best holding. Then, you take advantage of the dope who can't get away from his KQ on a Q 9 5 board when I'm holding a set of 5's. [/ QUOTE ] We're not talking about a 5+1 tourney here. [/ QUOTE ] Huh? I see that kind of hand on the $55's everytime I play. Worse even. |
|
|