Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:18 AM
LipBalmGuy LipBalmGuy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 26
Default Re: Question regarding pot equity

[ QUOTE ]
There's a whole bunch of stuff here that might answer some of your questions.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's an excellent link!

However, there should be more mention (both in this thread and in that article) of unfavorable flops for ram/jam. Namely, straight draws don't want a two-suited flop, and flush draws don't want a paired flop.

Real Good: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Less good: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Real Good: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Less good: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-13-2005, 11:10 AM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Question regarding pot equity

[ QUOTE ]
when you have a pot equity edge, is the concept always assuming that all of your opponents will call?

[/ QUOTE ]

Really good question.

Yes, it is assuming everyone will call. If you have 33% equity and bet for value, but only 1 person calls, from a value standpoint your bet was a theoretic mistake.

I use language here that isn't very convincing for a reason. I say it is a theoretic mistake from a value perspective becasue there are more reasons to raise than just to extract value. Example: if you have an equity edge at 33% you must have had at least 3 opponents. Now that only 1 person has called, your hand has 2 ways to win. It can win if it hits the draw you bet for value like before, but now it also has a better chance to win unimproved becasue you are HU.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2005, 11:24 AM
cold_cash cold_cash is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 412
Default Re: Question regarding pot equity

[ QUOTE ]
That's an excellent link!

[/ QUOTE ]



There's more to that site.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.