#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another Question For Christians
I'm assuming everyone who replied to this post is a Christian. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nooooooo! This is not the theology forum!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] At this stage of humanity we have more scientific proof that god as it is commonly understood in western society does not exist, than we do that god exists (essentially none) [/ QUOTE ] Id love to see some examples of this "proof" of non-existence. [/ QUOTE ] I'd say proof is too strong of a word. But what he's trying to get across, I think, is that the burden of the argument is on the ones claiming that something non-observable, is infact, real. I'm sure that many atheists would change their mind about all of this, if there were evidence. Personally, I don't view anyone differently whether they believe in the existence of God or not. I can't prove to you that there is no God, and you can't prove to me that there is. Both are theories and neither is 100% wrong, or 100% right. Do you believe in the theory of gravity in its accepted form? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another Question For Christians
Well I believe in God because it makes me feel good.
On the origional question,i'm not Catholic.-Bryce [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another Question For Christians
Dave, to believe in God you dont need proof
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pascal\'s Wager...
[ QUOTE ]
Sklansky, For those wannabe (and actually are) PHDs who'll call a losing hand on the river because they're getting 7 to 1 pot odds, and there's a slim (read silly) chance they have the best hand... Isn't Pascal's wager just a small EV river call into an infinite pot? And how do you argue against this mathematically? [/ QUOTE ] Asserting that the pot is infinite is tantamount to conceding the argument. We must assume that the pot is of unknown size. So, we cannot make a rational pot odds argument for either side. Pascal's wager also makes the assumption that Christianity is the only choice. Doesn't the wager also prove that we must all convert to Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Bhuddism? Even if there is a God, perhaps he intends to punish those who foolishly spend their time praying to him. It seems to me that the height of presumption is to posit an infinite mind, and then explain what that mind is thinking. GG |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another Question For Christians
One is G-d. All is one.
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nooooooo! This is not the theology forum!
[ QUOTE ]
God, rushes, its all the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] You're my kind of guy, Sklansky. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nooooooo! This is not the theology forum!
The THEORY of gravity??? Uh.... it's a bit more than a theory.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nooooooo! This is not the theology forum!
Well what I was referring to wasn't that "what goes up must come down", but the actual processes behind it. I was more referring to the fact that while we know that masses tend to move toward eachother, despite much research and theories, we don't know WHY they do.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nooooooo! This is not the theology forum!
good point, and an excellent example of how people overestimate what they know, and what science knows.
|
|
|