5-10 online hand played against the one and only JEFFAGE

[mdlm]

I wouldn't have three-bet pre-flop with ATs or ATo.

I'm confused. Jeffage wasn't the one who 3-bet preflop. You were.

Does this mean that with AT in Jeffage's position you would've folded after your re-reraise?

[Tyler Durden]

I think you're confusing me now. I was the PF 3-bettor, and I wouldn't have 3-bet with ATs.

[mdlm]

I think you're confusing me now. I was the PF 3-bettor, and I wouldn't have 3-bet with ATs.

LOL. Here is my question: How come no one puts Jeffage on AT/ATs?

In a post above Clarkmeister says he doesn't think that Jeffage would've raised an EP limper with AT/ATs. Jeffage himself says that he might've played AT/ATs this way.

Did you consider the possibility that Jeffage had AT/ATs and had you beat when you re-popped him on the turn?

[Jeffage]

I am not Lee Jones...I (and many others) find his preflop selection advice very bad, so trying to uncover my analyis based on his writings may lead you to some strange conclusions. My comments were about postflop play (as it related to ATs) and not preflop play. If your standard play is to raise one limper with A10o, your preflop play may need some work. A10s usually prefers many callers..in the passive game we were in (as Tyler wrote) I would likely call with that hand and hope for a multiway pot. I may fold A10o with just one limper. Of course, I could raise with either hand if a loose player was the limper or if the game was more ram and jam I'd prob toss A10o and raise A10s....I like to vary my play, but you have to consider the action (here, one limper) and the game conditions. Clark's suggestion that I wouldn't raise one limper with A10 is (generally) correct.

Jeff

[Tyler Durden]

I didn't really consider the possibility that he had AT. I put him on AK after he just called my turn 3-bet.