Difficulty levels in micro limits

[ckmj23]

Post some of your stats/hands.

It depends how many hands you've played, etc.

[rafct]

I started with 0.05/0.10 too. But played at the Prima sites, and first of all Pacific.
Pacific 0.05/0.10 is the closest to play money, but not the same as it.
Prima 0.05/0.10 is harder than pacific but still very easy.
0.10/0.20 is harder, but also great. At 0.25/0.50 then I felt the players are better, few to the flop, I would win less with my big hands and get trapped a lot more.

[Downrock]

Unfortunately I haven't invested in PT yet. That's top priority when i move up to .5/1 though, which should be in the next couple days.

[Simplistic]

perhaps i'm a minority here but i jumped right to 2/4. at the B&M i play 3/6 so why not play a similar limit instead of the micros?

i've been playing online poker since last summer and am primarily a tournament player, although that has changed, i decided to sign up for rakeback @ UB and jumped into 2/4. so far over a micro-sample size i'm crushing the game. i see no reason for that to change as there are many tight-passives, some tight-aggressives, and a few LAGS. but all yo ugotta do is re-raise those lags to put them in their place and they don't bother you too much anymore [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]