#1
|
|||
|
|||
Highest possible ITM%?
Say we have a ridiculously good professional player who has a 40% ITM for 200+15's. We send him down to play 10+1 SNG's. After a minimum of 300 of these, playing only 1 or 2 tables at a time, what is the highest realistic ITM% possible?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
Lorinda would have the best idea. I assume you're talking Party...that is a crucial bit of info, btw.
I'd guess 55%...but will defer to Lorinda's judgement no matter what on this question. If you search well....you can find what Irie felt was the upper limit 1 tabling @ the $11s I believe... Yugoslav Oh, and this question is very irrelevent, btw...but it's cool, [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
since its only over 300, and with good variance and all, i would say its around 53%. 3uo
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
posts like this bug so much. why do you care about ITM. ROI is the only thing that matters.
this is like asking "what's the highest possible win % at showdown?" who cares, why use some metric that is indirectly related to winrate when we actually have the winrate metric. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
300 is such a small sample that just about anyone could achieve a 60% ITM over a course of 300. Its not likely, but possible.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
[ QUOTE ]
posts like this bug so much. why do you care about ITM. ROI is the only thing that matters. this is like asking "what's the highest possible win % at showdown?" who cares, why use some metric that is indirectly related to winrate when we actually have the winrate metric. [/ QUOTE ] When it comes to what you want in a game you WANT the ROI.. this is your paycheck. ITM is a much better way to guage HOW your game is doing. You can be a large % more sure about your ITM than your roi. ROI is extremely variant. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
You people must smoke some very serious Ganja....What makes you think that a winning $215'r would necessarily be even a winner at $11's; much less a particularly big winner...Skill could not overcome variance...The biggest part of winning at $215's is stealing blinds and moving people off of better hands...How do you do either one at $11's?...You got an atom bomb?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
[ QUOTE ]
You people must smoke some very serious Ganja....What makes you think that a winning $215'r would necessarily be even a winner at $11's; much less a particularly big winner...Skill could not overcome variance...The biggest part of winning at $215's is stealing blinds and moving people off of better hands...How do you do either one at $11's?...You got an atom bomb? [/ QUOTE ] I ignored the '300' part of the OP....I gave him the benefit of the doubt and assumed he meant long term ITM @ the $11s for an amazing $215er. But again, not asking this question is much wiser than actually asking it, [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]. Yugoslav |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
There you go Skipper, you have vindicated all the $11 newbies who only lose because their bets get no respect, so they move up to the $55's. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Highest possible ITM%?
[ QUOTE ]
How do you do either one at $11's?...You got an atom bomb? [/ QUOTE ] You don't....instead you PROFIT BITCH! C'mon, your buddy the forum bot knows this... Yugoslav Have fun trying to tell Lil' Skippy that the $215s are easier than the $11s, [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. |
|
|