#1
|
|||
|
|||
A question on rarity of upswings I suppose...
Anyone know how rare it would be to run at 8.5-9 BB /100 at 2/4 over 3k hands? How about 5k? Would it even be possible over 10k?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question on rarity of upswings I suppose...
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone know how rare it would be to run at 8.5-9 BB /100 at 2/4 over 3k hands? How about 5k? Would it even be possible over 10k? [/ QUOTE ] I've ran that high at various limits but never for more than 2k hands at a time. You would probably get a better answer from the probability forum though. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question on rarity of upswings I suppose...
Post in probability. 10k hands is nothing.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question on rarity of upswings I suppose...
Thanks for the constructive reply Errant! You reiterated the point that had already been made that this should go in probability and then threw out a useless factoid that 10k hands is nothing. Just a quick reminder but everyone already knows that. Thanks! (If you can't tell neither I nor anyone else in this forum wants/needs/requires you to follow me around posting garbage)
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question on rarity of upswings I suppose...
[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the constructive reply Errant! You reiterated the point that had already been made that this should go in probability and then threw out a useless factoid that 10k hands is nothing. Just a quick reminder but everyone already knows that. Thanks! (If you can't tell neither I nor anyone else in this forum wants/needs/requires you to follow me around posting garbage) [/ QUOTE ] I didn't read the other reply. You made three posts already. None of them particularly interesting. If you knew 10k hands is nothing, why would you ask such a silly question? It's pointless anyway. If you knew what posts should go in SSH, or how many you should be posting, or what the etiquette of the forum was, you wouldn't have made this posting. In other words: my reply was constructive. |
|
|