Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:15 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

I haven't been at this table long enough to have a read, and I haven't played 3/6 enough to know what is and isn't "typical." I do however wonder if you think my river play is "value betting" or "nutso."

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB 3-bets</font>, UTG folds, Hero calls, MP3 calls.

Through a couple of orbits all I know is that the table is tight so yes, I like my hand, moreso when I can narrow the field, and even buy the button from MP1. Not standard, but its a damn tight table.

Flop: (10.33 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP3 folds, BB calls.

I like this flop for my hand. I think I'm ahead so I raise. Pretty standard.


Turn: (7.16 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

Not a great card, but certianly the best of the face cards. He checks, I bet again.

River: (9.16 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

This wasn't likely to change anything. If he bets out I reluctantly call. If he c/r's me, I probably make a really bad call. I hated it when he called and that's why I'm questioning the bet.



Final Pot: 11.16 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:26 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

well played. the river bet depends on whether he'll pay you off with overs, but I'd suspect he'd put in another raise on the flop with AA/KK, and he might lead the flop with QQ since he'd have an OESD. so I'd expect you to be ahead her most of the time
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:29 PM
flopmonster flopmonster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 31
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

What hand that you have beat would call in this spot.?? i would put him on sumthing like a10 or a draw. check this river
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:32 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

AT? he 3-bet preflop. AK or AQ seem by far the most probable, and headsup, theyw ill both pay off frequently
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:35 PM
afk afk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

[ QUOTE ]
AT? he 3-bet preflop. AK or AQ seem by far the most probable, and headsup, theyw ill both pay off frequently

[/ QUOTE ]

Enough that hero will win at least 55% of the time? When the table is tight like this? Unfortunatly we don't have a read on villain though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:41 PM
ayecappy ayecappy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sweden
Posts: 26
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar till:</font><hr />
Enough that hero will win at least 55% of the time?

[/ QUOTE ]
What do you base that figure on, his possible range of hands, the pot size?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:45 PM
afk afk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Enough that hero will win at least 55% of the time?

[/ QUOTE ]
What do you base that figure on, his possible range of hands, the pot size?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going off of Theory of Poker (someone tell me if I have it wrong). But on the end when your opponent checks to you, you should be if you think you'll have the best hand at least 55% of the time when he calls. You have to win more than half the time to make the bet profitable, and the extra 5% I believe accounts for when you get check-raised.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:50 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Enough that hero will win at least 55% of the time?

[/ QUOTE ]
What do you base that figure on, his possible range of hands, the pot size?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going off of Theory of Poker (someone tell me if I have it wrong). But on the end when your opponent checks to you, you should be if you think you'll have the best hand at least 55% of the time when he calls. You have to win more than half the time to make the bet profitable, and the extra 5% I believe accounts for when you get check-raised.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have to think that being c/r'd here is very, very rare, no?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:57 PM
afk afk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

I'm just going from what I remember from Theory of Poker. Even if getting check-raised is not a possibility, you still have to win more than 50% of the time when called to make the bet profitable. It's possible you might have some folding equity, but if villain has an over pair I really don't see him laying it down.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2005, 08:13 PM
suspicious_mind suspicious_mind is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: Since we\'re talking about mid-PPs, from last night.....

Villain has AK or QQ and I don't think he will pay off with AK, all he can beat is...eh, nothing. Some people just can't lay ace high down though even when there is really no way he can have the best hand so I guess against a players like that you can bet. I think the chance he's got QQ and is worried about AA, KK, JJ-99 is better than him paying you off with ace high though but I might be wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.