|
|
#74
03-28-2005, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK so no takers on a new forum....
You dislike the existing class system (the one that excludes you), and the solution is to replace it with a new class system (with results-oriented rules YOU set up so YOU can be included)? My head just exploded.
It's especially asinine considering that the forum exists to give poker advice and this percieved existing class system is based on quality and quantity of ADVICE given. I don't care what your ITM% is, if it's good advice and it helps my game then I'll take it. I'm not studying projectile physics and expecting Randy Johnson to give me the formulas. I have a fairly good ITM over my 1000+ SNGs so far this year, but I don't expect anybody to automatically listen to anything that comes out of my pie hole about this game. I haven't earned that respect yet. 
|
|
#75
03-28-2005, 02:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
it has been said they are inaccurate...but so what? at least it is a yard stick. some basis for credibility as a poker player other than having made 15,000 posts on this forum. [/ QUOTE ] The whole idea behind a yard stick is that every one is the same length.. Welcome to a new world where some yards are longer/shorter then others. This ought to be fun. Especially for the football fans, and not to mention carpenters. And my point remains... The move advice was based solely on a 123 game inaccurate popro sample size. Bankroll was never mentioned, and it is more important then any stats. There is a difference between the 20s and 30s btw(IMNSHO). Its significant enough too.
|
|
#76
03-28-2005, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
Phil H has some pretty decent stats, but his books suck.
No content, I just wanted to get a dig in on someone other then OP.
|
|
#77
03-28-2005, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
Why do threads like this get 7 pages of responses?? [/ QUOTE ] 3 of them by my count are ***You are ignoring this user***, but my count may be off by 50% in either direction so it's kinda worthless 2 digs in one post and one of them isn't on the OP...I think I'm gonna go off and start my own humor forum where only the top 10% of 2+2 posters can post in, cause the rest of you suck.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
