Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-16-2005, 03:21 PM
riverboatking riverboatking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: indenial
Posts: 137
Default Re: 3-handed 10/20 NL

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand this. Now, I am entirely on the side of fold, but it's a matter of +EV. You don't wait for big edges, if you have an edge here, this is your edge over all, playing the small ones.

But you don't have an edge here so fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm walking out the door so i don't have time for an extended debate, but hopefully someone can step up to defend my position which is:

if you have a big edge over this opponent, why put it all in preflop (and thus not be able to exploit that edge any further) when it is very likely that the best situation you are facing is a coinflip...follow?

even if you hypothetically did have a small edge in this situation i would still advocate a fold.
why take the very small edge when it effectively takes the place of a much larger edge.
i believe it was sklansky who talked about not taking a bet today if losing it will stop you from taking a much better bet tomorrow.
and since this is a RESTRICTED buy-in game, if he loses this hand he will no longer be able to cover the player over whom he has a big edge...follow?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-16-2005, 03:26 PM
Kaz The Original Kaz The Original is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: 3-handed 10/20 NL

Well, you're not doubt out the door, so hopefully someone can step up for you here.

Why do you think this is a restricted buy in game? I think most $10/$20 NL games are unrestricted. Most $5/$10 games around here are uncapped.

Also, if the very best situation you could be facing is a coinflip, this is likely not +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-16-2005, 03:39 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: 3-handed 10/20 NL

[ QUOTE ]
Why do you think this is a restricted buy in game?

[/ QUOTE ]

because he assumed
like me
it was online
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-16-2005, 03:59 PM
MMMMMM MMMMMM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: 3-handed 10/20 NL

[ QUOTE ]
because he assumed
like me
it was online

[/ QUOTE ]

Very nice.

Do you ever mess around with structured verse (beyond haiku-style and suchlike)?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-16-2005, 04:56 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: 3-handed 10/20 NL

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
because he assumed
like me
it was online

[/ QUOTE ]

Very nice.

Do you ever mess around with structured verse (beyond haiku-style and suchlike)?

[/ QUOTE ]

well sometimes i do
and sometimes i dont
but mostly free verse
yes that would be true
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-16-2005, 06:04 PM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default Re: 3-handed 10/20 NL

I think you're a huge dog here considerably more often then your a huge favorite. MAYBE the BB calls with jacks, AQ would be pretty damn loose, and your racing AK. I think given your edge, if there is indeed a minute edge here, is small enough that you can saftely get away from the hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.