Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-12-2005, 07:03 PM
arkady arkady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home of the Red Sox
Posts: 195
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

I would 3-bet that kind of monkey with KJ, however the SB poses several problems. This is a personal thing, but I prefer to have a worse hand with position than a better hand with out position.

So if I were you, I would probably not 3-bet, but that is because I hate acting first after I 3bet w/a marginal hand. Hmm, ok my reply is useless.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2005, 07:05 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

Arkady -- coldcall, then, or fold your KJ?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-12-2005, 07:07 PM
arkady arkady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home of the Red Sox
Posts: 195
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

oh, yeah, fold it, I sometimes fold good hands like AQ in the SB, thats how much I hate playing out of position. But obviously not to donks like you described, but KJ...bleh.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-12-2005, 07:10 PM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

I prefer cold-calling to 3betting. You will have good relative position post flop and can manipulate the other players by facing them with two cold when you pair up.

I think you have a large enough equity share pre flop that you make money by calling.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-12-2005, 07:51 PM
MAxx MAxx is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

I don't see much wrong with raising a weak limper from the button with KT. On the other hand the T9s after 2 limpers would raise my ebrows too.

I agree that 3betting doesnt seem like a good plan with KJo unless he was openraising.

First time or two I saw this donkey raise like this, I would fold hands like KJo. 3rd time I call.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-13-2005, 09:19 AM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

I despise calling with KJo in this position- haveing the 2$ discount in the SB (at the 5/10 level) just isn't much of a consolation.
A hand like KJo has the ever famous reverse implied odds against it- and if you think you are getting enough equity preflop to clal you really should be raising to punish the weak limpers (which they would have to be for you to justify a call) and take a shot at driving them out of the pot and creating dead money.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-13-2005, 09:44 AM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

im one of these monkeys. i raise alot of hands on the button and will raise a limper with T9s in many situations. frankly, i dont like being 3bet. it sucks. also, it sucks when people start check-calling the flop and checkraising the turn against me. i end up spewing alot of chips that way.

just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-13-2005, 10:48 AM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

I assumed Grisgra's post was targetted at 10/20 where his pot odds are 6.33:1(2 limpers+BB) or 5:1(1 limper+BB) instead of 5/10 where he gets 4.56:1(2 limpers+BB) or 3.44:1(1 limper+BB). As you can see, big difference in pot odds between the two levels.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-13-2005, 12:22 PM
Gk123 Gk123 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

From the looks of your post it seems that this cat is somewhat deceptive in his pre-flop style, and since u arn't just labeling him a maniac u can figure him for some "Decent" hand.
By "Decent" I mean random suited connectory, 2 cards 9 or above etc., possibly some random A, or small pair.
There are also times in that dude is just going to have something that has KJ in allot of trouble.


As far as the limpers, it is my esp. that most people who are weak enough to limp fully intend to play the hand.

With limpers, raiseing would more than likely just make KJ harder to play as folding of limping cats is less than 50/50. This with the fact the range of hands that the button could have definatly puts u in a tough spot.

Putting in multiple bets with a KJ in the SB in multi-way pot seems bad to me yo.

Now if dude is 1st in on button, definatly a different story. If u think there is a shot at getting BB out then raise. I'm not a fan of playing any hand out of SB agaist steal when i ain't runnin the show.

The range of hands I might do this with would include any pair, QJ, KJ, A9 etc etc etc.


Either way, need to be sure that u don't fall in love with 3 betting out of SB, the possition is awful
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-13-2005, 01:43 PM
fyodor fyodor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 596
Default Re: Playing the SB after an idiot raises from the CO/Button . . .

I'm reminded of the theme song from M.A.S.H.

As others have pointed out, 3 betting KJo against a lone CO/Button stealer is one thing, but when there are loose limpers to contend with it borders on suicidal.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.