#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m pretty sure I\'m behind to a bigger PP
um, nope
fim |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m pretty sure I\'m behind to a bigger PP
where did i ever say anything about the preflop call or calling 10% of your stack being a good bet?
I simply said that set over set certainly does not happen 20% of the time given this hand. I showed why and why your calculations were giving an overinflated estimate. I think i've more than proven this. fim |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m pretty sure I\'m behind to a bigger PP
I said it was close to 20%. In reality it's 16.5%, with another 3.2% chance of losing to a flush or straight. Big deal.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m pretty sure I\'m behind to a bigger PP
i give up.
fim |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
THE REAL: ODDS ON SET OVER SET : Fimbul you\'ll love me
It obviously cannot be 20% of the time you play this hand... you're going to be playing past the flop 1 in 8 times, so already the chance of set over set are 12.5%. But then, he's going to have a set by the river 1 in 5 times, so thats 1 in 5 of 12.5%, or 20% of 12.5%, around 5% of the time. You should hit set over set 5% of the time, assuming your opponent always goes to the river when you hit a set, which is not correct, so it's even smaller.
|
|
|