Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:16 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default AQo vs. two loose limpers and two decent limpers.

Hand 1: 28.8145 % [ 00.28 00.01 ] { AKo }
Hand 2: 17.3750 % [ 00.17 00.01 ] { 88-22, ATs-A2s, KTs-K9s, QJs-Q9s, JTs-J8s, T9s-T6s, 98s-96s, 87s-85s, 76s, AJo-A2o, KJo-K9o, QJo-QTo, JTo }
Hand 3: 16.3948 % [ 00.16 00.01 ] { random }
Hand 4: 20.9661 % [ 00.20 00.01 ] { TT-22, AJs-A2s, KTs, QJs-QTs, JTs-J9s, T9s, 98s, 87s, 76s, AJo-A8o, KJo, QJo-QTo, JTo }
Hand 5: 16.4497 % [ 00.16 00.01 ] { random }
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:18 AM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: BB options

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
raise

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok I'm curious... why raise here? He's out of position with a hand that will win 16-17% of the time against 4 limpers.

This is a limp in my book. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind this. Please don't just tell me there's positive EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

16-17% is WAY off. If your limpers are decent it's around 25%, and if they're loose and bad, it's closer to 30%. It's way more than fair share here.

There isn't much equity difference between AKo and AQo in this instance (it amounts to a 2% difference). For the same reasons that AKo is worth a raise, AQo is -- it's basically equity and pot ownership.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

You made me go and bust out my HPAP, which is a good thing, but is says limp here. I guess your assumption that the players limping will call with crap and so you're probably right that EV is higher than 17%. I wouldn't raise this playing a 2/4 or higher table, even with a couple loose/passives.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:21 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: BB options

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
raise

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok I'm curious... why raise here? He's out of position with a hand that will win 16-17% of the time against 4 limpers.

This is a limp in my book. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind this. Please don't just tell me there's positive EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

16-17% is WAY off. If your limpers are decent it's around 25%, and if they're loose and bad, it's closer to 30%. It's way more than fair share here.

There isn't much equity difference between AKo and AQo in this instance (it amounts to a 2% difference). For the same reasons that AKo is worth a raise, AQo is -- it's basically equity and pot ownership.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

You made me go and bust out my HPAP, which is a good thing, but is says limp here. I guess your assumption that the players limping will call with crap and so you're probably right that EV is higher than 17%. I wouldn't raise this playing a 2/4 or higher table, even with a couple loose/passives.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's an easy raise at 2/4 and 3/6. I haven't played higher so I can't speak for those.

HEPFAP isn't a big advocate of raising offsuit broadways, and many people disagree. The classic question is AJo in LP after loose limpers; most think it's worth a raise, but HEPFAP doesn't.

Keep in mind, HEPFAP also advocates not raising JJ and TT from the blinds in many instances. It was not written for play in games like today's.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:24 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: BB options

I will say that if you feel the desire to autobet any flop after you raised PF, then raising PF with this hand is a mistake; if that's the case, however, you've got bigger issues to worry about.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:25 AM
dangerous_badman dangerous_badman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manor
Posts: 26
Default Re: BB options

[ QUOTE ]
You made me go and bust out my HPAP, which is a good thing, but is says limp here. I guess your assumption that the players limping will call with crap and so you're probably right that EV is higher than 17%. I wouldn't raise this playing a 2/4 or higher table, even with a couple loose/passives.

[/ QUOTE ]

At the microlimits (and often higher) your opponents' most likely holdings are crap that you utterly pwn like J4s and A7o. Any hand that is substantially ahead of yours at this point (AK, AA-QQ) would already have let you know. Your hand has a considerable equity edge against the field, which you should exploit.

HPFAP deals with games that play a lot tougher than your average online microlimit affair, where checking AQ here may be wiser. For what it's worth, I'm raising this here 100% of the time at 2/4 and 3/6.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:39 AM
FreakDaddy FreakDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 651
Default Re: BB options

[ QUOTE ]


It's an easy raise at 2/4 and 3/6. I haven't played higher so I can't speak for those.

HEPFAP isn't a big advocate of raising offsuit broadways, and many people disagree. The classic question is AJo in LP after loose limpers; most think it's worth a raise, but HEPFAP doesn't.

Keep in mind, HEPFAP also advocates not raising JJ and TT from the blinds in many instances. It was not written for play in games like today's.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, thanks for the info. You gave me something to chew on. I'm assuming your running your sim on Poker stove? The EV isn't taking into consideration position if so. I think that brings down the EV of this hand considerably, BUT I still think your points are valid. Most of these players are probably holding nominal cards. That being the case getting your value bets in now of course is a good play.

On a ragged flop with all under cards how would you play this?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:43 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: BB options

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


It's an easy raise at 2/4 and 3/6. I haven't played higher so I can't speak for those.

HEPFAP isn't a big advocate of raising offsuit broadways, and many people disagree. The classic question is AJo in LP after loose limpers; most think it's worth a raise, but HEPFAP doesn't.

Keep in mind, HEPFAP also advocates not raising JJ and TT from the blinds in many instances. It was not written for play in games like today's.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, thanks for the info. You gave me something to chew on. I'm assuming your running your sim on Poker stove? The EV isn't taking into consideration position if so. I think that brings down the EV of this hand considerably, BUT I still think your points are valid. Most of these players are probably holding nominal cards. That being the case getting your value bets in now of course is a good play.

On a ragged flop with all under cards how would you play this?

[/ QUOTE ]

It really depends on the flop, who bets, and what I know about them. Often check-calling, sometimes checkraising, and occasionally check-folding. It isn't any different from how you'd play AK.

BTW, yes, I ran it on pokerstove, and that's an equity sim, not an EV sim. Position makes a huge difference, but you are going to have a hard time making up the .5BB (.25x4SB) postflop when you check.

Rob
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.