Looking for BETA testers for new software - Party data mining - Page 2

lawpoker · #11 02-28-2005, 05:38 PM

me too. pm me and i'll do what i can.

Jamper · #12 02-28-2005, 11:41 PM

Suggestion:

Offer the Pooh-bahs (or people with X posts) free testing. Charge a small fee to everyone else. [You could easily set up a PayPal account for this.]

I'm assuming you want reputable posters to be able to vouch for the program when you release it. But this approach has problems, b/c how is 'reputable' defined? Better not to hurt anyone's feelings by using post count.

Also, this is a good program idea and many many people would want to employ it, even in beta stage. Why not get some cash now from the people with low post counts? Ex: charge them one-half the retail cost now and the remaining half to upgrade to the 1st retail version when you publish it.

That said, I'm interested in beta-testing as well.

-jamp

Kenrick · #13 03-03-2005, 05:40 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Suggestion:

Offer the Pooh-bahs (or people with X posts) free testing. Charge a small fee to everyone else.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pooh-bahs who have half of their posts in the off-topic forum? Sounds like a plan.

ukgazz · #14 03-03-2005, 08:35 PM

Please PM me if you need any more testers...

UKGazz

apd138 · #15 03-04-2005, 07:23 AM

PM me i would love to take part in this.

Bacchus · #16 03-04-2005, 11:12 AM

Does your program have to run in conjunction with Poker Tracker? I'm interested in helping you, although I just uninstalled PT. PM me if you still need volunteers.

goodguy_1 · #17 03-04-2005, 03:42 PM

PM me also please.I pretty much datamine whenever I'm not playing and would be happy to be a beta tester.

Jamper · #18 03-04-2005, 07:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Suggestion:

Offer the Pooh-bahs (or people with X posts) free testing. Charge a small fee to everyone else.

[/ QUOTE ] Pooh-bahs who have half of their posts in the off-topic forum? Sounds like a plan.

[/ QUOTE ]

Kenrick: Thanks for illustrating my point

<about how easily people get wound up over this issue>

Prod1gy: Kenrick popped a fuse over simple post counts. Imagine what you would encounter if you tried to sort people based on your opinion of their "reputations."

Kenrick · #19 03-05-2005, 04:50 AM

I didn't pop a fuse or got wound up. I was pointing out the silliness of judging someone's knowledge or character based on post count, which tends to happen on the various forum sites I read. There is little reason to have a post counter next to people's names.

GoblinMason (Craig) · #20 03-05-2005, 03:40 PM

I'm interested if you want to PM me.