Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: $2/$4. $600 max buy in. Which line do you prefer?
2 fish 5 OKs 2 sharks + you 3 5.88%
2 fish 2 OKs 5 sharks + you 0 0%
5 fish 2 OKs 2 Shark + you 13 25.49%
3 fish 3 OKs 3 sharks + you 5 9.80%
9 sharks + you 0 0%
9 fish + you 30 58.82%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:40 PM
X-Files X-Files is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 81
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

I voted for #2. Wow, I might just have to sell my pokerchips.com chips for a set of these. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:43 PM
duma duma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The OC
Posts: 213
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

[ QUOTE ]
Somehow, I got this mental picture of TenPercenter taking delivery of 1,000 boxes of chips, dumping them in a wading pool, and wallowing around in them for a while before shipping out the individual orders.

[/ QUOTE ]

ya, Ten's a regular Scrooge McDuck of poker chips!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:55 PM
duma duma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The OC
Posts: 213
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

[ QUOTE ]
Ten;

Unlike everyone else, I really like #3. It's a little busy, but I like the "iconic" look, rather than the faux-casino look. It seems like I'm in the minority here, but if you rounded the edges on the hexagon and simplified the icon a little it might have got more votes. Another potential advantage to #3 is that it is that it might be compatible with the octagons and plaques of the original Egyptians….

[/ QUOTE ]

#3 is better suited for a Giant inlay along the same lines of the Vineyards and Bellagio chips. it does not look good as using the geometric inlay shapes. if it were to take up the majority of the chip, then it would look fantastic (along with a few color tweaks to match the chip colors of course)

but people, you do realize that these designs will probably be nothing like the actual chip right? they are just here for reference and to get an idea of what people like. the actual logo and writing on the chip are not set in stone.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:58 PM
warewulf warewulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 266
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

I also voted for #2, but almost chose #1. I do think #2 is more modern and will fit better with the colors allowed.

Regarding the inlay shapes -- I was under the impression that Dice702 didn't have a choice about the size. I thought I read somewhere that the trademark chips are going to have the same inlay size mis-match. If this is the case and you are forced to make them that way, I would be tempted, but would probably pass.

If you are sucessful with getting the inlay shapes varied, I don't see how I could pass up a set, probably 500 for me. Will depend on my chip budget at the time though. Currently I'm WAY over budget.

Another idea if there are too many restrictions on the Paulsons might be to go with TR King.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-01-2005, 03:17 PM
duma duma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The OC
Posts: 213
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips






i hope its along the lines of these for the inlay shape
25c cirlce
$1 octagon?
$5 flower
$25 star
$100 widget
$500 hexagon
$1000 ?
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-01-2005, 03:23 PM
toots toots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bedford, NH
Posts: 193
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

I'll spend a grand (or more) on Paulsons. I won't on TR King. I might think about it for ASMs or Blue Chips, but Blue Chips would be pretty dang iffy.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-01-2005, 03:34 PM
warewulf warewulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 266
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

Off topic now, I just got this chip on Ebay:



I like the old style design, but probably wouldn't look good on the new Paulsons.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-01-2005, 03:49 PM
rosko23 rosko23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

#2 it is... I am down for either 1000 or 2000.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-01-2005, 04:27 PM
Dick Danger Dick Danger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

100,000 .......... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-01-2005, 04:45 PM
toots toots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bedford, NH
Posts: 193
Default Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips

In other words, 100 of us fools with money we're willing to part with for a kilochip.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.